Materials / Compare

FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Polypropylene

Compare FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Polypropylene strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
FDM Polycarbonate3D printed (FDM)
Plastic PolypropyleneBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength53.3MPasourcetypical33MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield ISO 527
Ultimate tensile strength53.3MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield)not sourced
Flexural strength89.4MPasourcetypicalnot sourced
Elongation at break9.2%sourcetypicalnot sourced
Young's modulus (stiffness)2.39GPasourcetypical1.45GPasourcetypical, tensile modulus ISO 527
Density1,180–1,200kg/m³sourcerange900kg/m³sourcetypical, 23 °C ISO 1183-1
Strength to weight44.8kN·m/kg22% higher36.7kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight2.01MN·m/kg25% higher1.61MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.38sourcebase material: polycarbonate family typical (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1)0.42sourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene)
Shear modulus0.867GPa1.7x stiffer in shear0.511GPa
Bulk modulus3.33GPa3.02GPa
Speed of sound1,418m/s1,269m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.2W/m·Ksourcebase material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, through-plane, 23 °C0.17–0.22W/m·Ksourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene)
Thermal expansion65µm/m·Ksourcebase material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, 23-55 °C, parallel80–100µm/m·Ksourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing325µm growth38% less450µm growth
Specific heatnot sourcednot sourced
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)not sourcednot sourced
Thermal shock resistance42.5W/m49% more resistant28.6W/m
Glass transition108°Csourcetypicalnot sourced
Max service temperature105°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)90°CsourceHDT 0.45 MPa (ISO 75B), unannealed
Values forUltimaker PC, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat); Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS (file v5.00), April 20, 2022.LyondellBasell Moplen HP501H polypropylene homopolymer (general purpose), typical ISO values

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

FDM Polycarbonate is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is FDM Polycarbonate stronger than Plastic Polypropylene?

FDM Polycarbonate is stronger: its yield strength is 53.3 MPa against 33 MPa for Plastic Polypropylene (1.62x).

Which is lighter, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic Polypropylene?

Plastic Polypropylene is lighter: 900 kg/m³ against 1,190 kg/m³ for FDM Polycarbonate.

Which is stiffer, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic Polypropylene?

FDM Polycarbonate is stiffer: Young's modulus 2.39 GPa against 1.45 GPa for Plastic Polypropylene, so the same part in FDM Polycarbonate deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic Polypropylene?

For the same stiffness or strength: FDM Polycarbonate is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), strong rod or tie, strong beam; Plastic Polypropylene is lighter for a stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beFDM PolycarbonatePlastic Polypropylene
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter25% heavier
Stiff beam (bending)3% heavierlighter
Stiff panel or plate12% heavierlighter
Strong rod or tielighter22% heavier
Strong beamlighter4% heavier
Strong panel or plate4% heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic Polypropylene?

FDM Polycarbonate conducts heat better: 0.2 W/m·K against 0.195 W/m·K for Plastic Polypropylene.

Which expands less with temperature?

FDM Polycarbonate expands less: 65 µm/m·K against 90 µm/m·K for Plastic Polypropylene.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelFDM PolycarbonatePlastic Polypropylene
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickFDM PolycarbonatePlastic Polypropylene
Strength against density

Related comparisons