Materials / Compare

Plastic PETG vs. Plastic Polycarbonate

Compare Plastic PETG vs. Plastic Polycarbonate strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Plastic PETG3D printed (FDM)
Plastic PolycarbonateBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength46.2MPasourcetypical65MPasourcetypical, tensile yield
Ultimate tensile strength46.2MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield)65MPasourcetypical, stress at break
Flexural strength78.9MPasourcetypical97MPasourcetypical, flexural strength
Elongation at break7.6%sourcetypical125%sourcetypical, strain at break
Young's modulus (stiffness)1.94GPasourcetypical2.4GPasourcetypical24% stiffer
Density1,270kg/m³sourcetypical1,200kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight36.4kN·m/kg54.2kN·m/kg49% higher
Stiffness to weight1.53MN·m/kg2MN·m/kg31% higher
Poisson's rationot sourced0.38sourcetypical, polycarbonate family (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1)
Shear modulusnot sourced0.87GPa
Bulk modulusnot sourced3.33GPa
Speed of sound1,236m/s1,414m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.21W/m·Ksourcebase material: Eastman Eastar Copolyester 6763 (PETG), typical0.2W/m·Ksourcetypical, through-plane, 23 C
Thermal expansion51µm/m·Ksourcebase material: Eastman Eastar Copolyester 6763 (PETG), typical65µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 23-55 C, parallel and normal
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing255µm growth27% less325µm growth
Specific heat1,300J/kg·Ksourcebase material: Eastman Eastar Copolyester 6763 (PETG), DSC at 60 °C (lowest temperature listed)1,172J/kg·Ksourcetypical (guide value), Bayer ASTM datasheet for Makrolon 2405, ASTM D 2766
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)0.127mm²/s0.142mm²/s12% faster
Thermal shock resistancenot sourced51.7W/m
Glass transition77.4°Csourcetypical144°Csourcetypical, DSC 10 C/min
Max service temperature76.2°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)125°CsourceUL 746B RTI, tensile strength, 1.5 mm
Values forUltimaker PETG, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat); Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS v1.00, April 29, 2022.Covestro Makrolon 2405 general-purpose PC (MVR 19), Covestro technical datasheet version 2026-09-28, typical values

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Plastic PETG is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is Plastic PETG stronger than Plastic Polycarbonate?

Plastic Polycarbonate is stronger: its yield strength is 65 MPa against 46.2 MPa for Plastic PETG (41%).

Which is lighter, Plastic PETG or Plastic Polycarbonate?

Plastic Polycarbonate is lighter: 1,200 kg/m³ against 1,270 kg/m³ for Plastic PETG.

Which is stiffer, Plastic PETG or Plastic Polycarbonate?

Plastic Polycarbonate is stiffer: Young's modulus 2.4 GPa against 1.94 GPa for Plastic PETG, so the same part in Plastic Polycarbonate deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic PETG or Plastic Polycarbonate?

For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic Polycarbonate is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must bePlastic PETGPlastic Polycarbonate
Stiff rod or tie (tension)31% heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)18% heavierlighter
Stiff panel or plate14% heavierlighter
Strong rod or tie49% heavierlighter
Strong beam33% heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate26% heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Plastic PETG or Plastic Polycarbonate?

Plastic PETG conducts heat better: 0.21 W/m·K against 0.2 W/m·K for Plastic Polycarbonate.

Which expands less with temperature?

Plastic PETG expands less: 51 µm/m·K against 65 µm/m·K for Plastic Polycarbonate.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPlastic PETGPlastic Polycarbonate
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPlastic PETGPlastic Polycarbonate
Strength against density

Related comparisons