Materials / Compare
Plastic PETG vs. Plastic Polycarbonate
Compare Plastic PETG vs. Plastic Polycarbonate strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 46.2MPasourcetypical | 65MPasourcetypical, tensile yield |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 46.2MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield) | 65MPasourcetypical, stress at break |
| Flexural strength | 78.9MPasourcetypical | 97MPasourcetypical, flexural strength |
| Elongation at break | 7.6%sourcetypical | 125%sourcetypical, strain at break |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 1.94GPasourcetypical | 2.4GPasourcetypical24% stiffer |
| Density | 1,270kg/m³sourcetypical | 1,200kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 36.4kN·m/kg | 54.2kN·m/kg49% higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 1.53MN·m/kg | 2MN·m/kg31% higher |
| Poisson's ratio | not sourced | 0.38sourcetypical, polycarbonate family (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1) |
| Shear modulus | not sourced | 0.87GPa |
| Bulk modulus | not sourced | 3.33GPa |
| Speed of sound | 1,236m/s | 1,414m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 0.21W/m·Ksourcebase material: Eastman Eastar Copolyester 6763 (PETG), typical | 0.2W/m·Ksourcetypical, through-plane, 23 C |
| Thermal expansion | 51µm/m·Ksourcebase material: Eastman Eastar Copolyester 6763 (PETG), typical | 65µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 23-55 C, parallel and normal |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 255µm growth27% less | 325µm growth |
| Specific heat | 1,300J/kg·Ksourcebase material: Eastman Eastar Copolyester 6763 (PETG), DSC at 60 °C (lowest temperature listed) | 1,172J/kg·Ksourcetypical (guide value), Bayer ASTM datasheet for Makrolon 2405, ASTM D 2766 |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 0.127mm²/s | 0.142mm²/s12% faster |
| Thermal shock resistance | not sourced | 51.7W/m |
| Glass transition | 77.4°Csourcetypical | 144°Csourcetypical, DSC 10 C/min |
| Max service temperature | 76.2°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens) | 125°CsourceUL 746B RTI, tensile strength, 1.5 mm |
| Values for | Ultimaker PETG, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat); Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS v1.00, April 29, 2022. | Covestro Makrolon 2405 general-purpose PC (MVR 19), Covestro technical datasheet version 2026-09-28, typical values |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Plastic PETG is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is Plastic PETG stronger than Plastic Polycarbonate?
Plastic Polycarbonate is stronger: its yield strength is 65 MPa against 46.2 MPa for Plastic PETG (41%).
Which is lighter, Plastic PETG or Plastic Polycarbonate?
Plastic Polycarbonate is lighter: 1,200 kg/m³ against 1,270 kg/m³ for Plastic PETG.
Which is stiffer, Plastic PETG or Plastic Polycarbonate?
Plastic Polycarbonate is stiffer: Young's modulus 2.4 GPa against 1.94 GPa for Plastic PETG, so the same part in Plastic Polycarbonate deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic PETG or Plastic Polycarbonate?
For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic Polycarbonate is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | Plastic PETG | Plastic Polycarbonate |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 31% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 18% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | 14% heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | 49% heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 33% heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 26% heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Plastic PETG or Plastic Polycarbonate?
Plastic PETG conducts heat better: 0.21 W/m·K against 0.2 W/m·K for Plastic Polycarbonate.
Which expands less with temperature?
Plastic PETG expands less: 51 µm/m·K against 65 µm/m·K for Plastic Polycarbonate.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- Plastic PETG vs. SLA Resin Tough 2000
- Plastic PETG vs. Plastic ABS
- Plastic PETG vs. FDM Polycarbonate
- Plastic PETG vs. Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Nylon
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. SLA Resin Standard
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. FDM Polycarbonate
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. Plastic POM/Acetal