Materials / Compare

Plastic PLA vs. Plastic Polypropylene

Compare Plastic PLA vs. Plastic Polypropylene strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Plastic PLA3D printed (FDM)
Plastic PolypropyleneBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength52.5MPasourcetypical33MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield ISO 527
Ultimate tensile strength52.5MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield)not sourced
Flexural strength96.8MPasourcetypicalnot sourced
Elongation at break7.8%sourcetypicalnot sourced
Young's modulus (stiffness)3.25GPasourcetypical1.45GPasourcetypical, tensile modulus ISO 527
Density1,240kg/m³sourcetypical900kg/m³sourcetypical, 23 °C ISO 1183-1
Strength to weight42.3kN·m/kg15% higher36.7kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight2.62MN·m/kg1.63x higher1.61MN·m/kg
Poisson's rationot sourced0.42sourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene)
Shear modulusnot sourced0.511GPa
Bulk modulusnot sourced3.02GPa
Speed of sound1,619m/s1,269m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.13W/m·Ksourcebase material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °C0.17–0.22W/m·Ksourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene)
Thermal expansionnot sourced80–100µm/m·Ksourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swingnot sourced450µm growth
Specific heat1,200J/kg·Ksourcebase material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °Cnot sourced
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)0.0874mm²/snot sourced
Thermal shock resistancenot sourced28.6W/m
Melting point152°Csourcetypicalnot sourced
Glass transition59.1°Csourcetypicalnot sourced
Max service temperature58.8°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)90°CsourceHDT 0.45 MPa (ISO 75B), unannealed
Values forUltimaker PLA, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat) orientation; Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS dated April 20, 2022.LyondellBasell Moplen HP501H polypropylene homopolymer (general purpose), typical ISO values

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Plastic PLA is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is Plastic PLA stronger than Plastic Polypropylene?

Plastic PLA is stronger: its yield strength is 52.5 MPa against 33 MPa for Plastic Polypropylene (1.59x).

Which is lighter, Plastic PLA or Plastic Polypropylene?

Plastic Polypropylene is lighter: 900 kg/m³ against 1,240 kg/m³ for Plastic PLA.

Which is stiffer, Plastic PLA or Plastic Polypropylene?

Plastic PLA is stiffer: Young's modulus 3.25 GPa against 1.45 GPa for Plastic Polypropylene, so the same part in Plastic PLA deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic PLA or Plastic Polypropylene?

For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic PLA is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie; Plastic Polypropylene is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must bePlastic PLAPlastic Polypropylene
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter1.63x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter9% heavier
Stiff panel or plate5% heavierlighter
Strong rod or tielighter15% heavier
Strong beam1% heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate9% heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Plastic PLA or Plastic Polypropylene?

Plastic Polypropylene conducts heat better: 0.195 W/m·K against 0.13 W/m·K for Plastic PLA.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPlastic PLAPlastic Polypropylene
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPlastic PLAPlastic Polypropylene
Strength against density

Related comparisons