Materials / Compare

Plastic PLA vs. Stainless 304

Compare Plastic PLA vs. Stainless 304 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Plastic PLA3D printed (FDM)
Stainless 304Wrought
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength52.5MPasourcetypical241MPasourcetypical, annealed, 70 °F (21 °C)
Ultimate tensile strength52.5MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield)586MPasourcetypical, annealed, 70 °F (21 °C)
Flexural strength96.8MPasourcetypicalnot sourced
Elongation at break7.8%sourcetypical55%sourcetypical, annealed, in 2 in. (50.8 mm)
Young's modulus (stiffness)3.25GPasourcetypical193GPasourcetypical, in tension
Density1,240kg/m³sourcetypical6.48x lighter8,030kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight42.3kN·m/kg41% higher30kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight2.62MN·m/kg24MN·m/kg9.17x higher
Poisson's rationot sourced0.3sourcedesign value (structural stainless steels)
Shear modulusnot sourced74.2GPa
Bulk modulusnot sourced161GPa
Speed of sound1,619m/s4,903m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.13W/m·Ksourcebase material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °C16.2W/m·Ksourceat 100 °C
Thermal expansionnot sourced16.9µm/m·Ksourcemean, 0–100 °C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swingnot sourced84.5µm growth
Specific heat1,200J/kg·Ksourcebase material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °C500J/kg·Ksourcemean, 0–100 °C
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)0.0874mm²/s4.03mm²/s46.2x faster
Thermal shock resistancenot sourced838W/m
Melting point152°Csourcetypical1,399–1,454°Csourcemelting range
Glass transition59.1°Csourcetypicalnot sourced
Max service temperature58.8°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)899°Csourcecontinuous, oxidation (scaling) limit in air
Values forUltimaker PLA, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat) orientation; Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS dated April 20, 2022.Type 304, annealed flat-rolled (Cleveland-Cliffs 304/304L Product Data Bulletin, May 2021); Poisson's ratio from the Nickel Institute/SCI structural stainless design manual

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Plastic PLA is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is Plastic PLA stronger than Stainless 304?

Stainless 304 is stronger: its yield strength is 241 MPa against 52.5 MPa for Plastic PLA (4.59x).

Which is lighter, Plastic PLA or Stainless 304?

Plastic PLA is lighter: 1,240 kg/m³ against 8,030 kg/m³ for Stainless 304.

Which is stiffer, Plastic PLA or Stainless 304?

Stainless 304 is stiffer: Young's modulus 193 GPa against 3.25 GPa for Plastic PLA, so the same part in Stainless 304 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic PLA or Stainless 304?

For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic PLA is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate; Stainless 304 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending).

Part that must bePlastic PLAStainless 304
Stiff rod or tie (tension)9.17x heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)19% heavierlighter
Stiff panel or platelighter1.66x heavier
Strong rod or tielighter41% heavier
Strong beamlighter2.34x heavier
Strong panel or platelighter3.02x heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Plastic PLA or Stainless 304?

Stainless 304 conducts heat better: 16.2 W/m·K against 0.13 W/m·K for Plastic PLA.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPlastic PLAStainless 304
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPlastic PLAStainless 304
Strength against density

Related comparisons