Materials / Compare

Stainless 304 vs. Steel AISI 1018

Compare Stainless 304 vs. Steel AISI 1018 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Stainless 304Wrought
Steel AISI 1018Wrought
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength241MPasourcetypical, annealed, 70 °F (21 °C)372MPasourceproducer-stated, cold drawn
Ultimate tensile strength586MPasourcetypical, annealed, 70 °F (21 °C)441MPasourceproducer-stated, cold drawn
Elongation at break55%sourcetypical, annealed, in 2 in. (50.8 mm)15%sourcein 2 in (50.8 mm)
Young's modulus (stiffness)193GPasourcetypical, in tension200GPasourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Density8,030kg/m³sourcetypical7,861kg/m³sourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Strength to weight30kN·m/kg47.3kN·m/kg1.58x higher
Stiffness to weight24MN·m/kg25.4MN·m/kg6% higher
Poisson's ratio0.3sourcedesign value (structural stainless steels)0.32sourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Shear modulus74.2GPa75.7GPa2% stiffer in shear
Bulk modulus161GPa185GPa
Speed of sound4,903m/s5,043m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity16.2W/m·Ksourceat 100 °C51.9W/m·Ksourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Thermal expansion16.9µm/m·Ksourcemean, 0–100 °C12µm/m·Ksourcebase material: unalloyed carbon steel, Ovako family table (S275JR, 'none alloyed structural steels', C <= 0.21%); mean 20-300 °C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing84.5µm growth60µm growth41% less
Specific heat500J/kg·Ksourcemean, 0–100 °C486J/kg·Ksourcebase material: AISI 1025 plain carbon steel (MIL-HDBK-5J design value; ASTM A108 bar is the cold-finished carbon-steel bar spec that also covers 1018)
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)4.03mm²/s13.6mm²/s3.37x faster
Thermal shock resistance838W/m5,473W/m6.53x more resistant
Melting point1,399–1,454°Csourcemelting rangenot sourced
Max service temperature899°Csourcecontinuous, oxidation (scaling) limit in airnot sourced
Values forType 304, annealed flat-rolled (Cleveland-Cliffs 304/304L Product Data Bulletin, May 2021); Poisson's ratio from the Nickel Institute/SCI structural stainless design manualAISI 1018 cold drawn bar (Niagara LaSalle, cold-finished bar producer)

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Stainless 304 stronger than Steel AISI 1018?

Steel AISI 1018 is stronger: its yield strength is 372 MPa against 241 MPa for Stainless 304 (1.54x).

Which is lighter, Stainless 304 or Steel AISI 1018?

Steel AISI 1018 is lighter: 7,861 kg/m³ against 8,030 kg/m³ for Stainless 304.

Which is stiffer, Stainless 304 or Steel AISI 1018?

Steel AISI 1018 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 193 GPa for Stainless 304, so the same part in Steel AISI 1018 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Stainless 304 or Steel AISI 1018?

For the same stiffness or strength: Steel AISI 1018 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beStainless 304Steel AISI 1018
Stiff rod or tie (tension)6% heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)4% heavierlighter
Stiff panel or plate3% heavierlighter
Strong rod or tie1.58x heavierlighter
Strong beam36% heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate27% heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Stainless 304 or Steel AISI 1018?

Steel AISI 1018 conducts heat better: 51.9 W/m·K against 16.2 W/m·K for Stainless 304.

Which expands less with temperature?

Steel AISI 1018 expands less: 12 µm/m·K against 16.9 µm/m·K for Stainless 304.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumStainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelStainless 304Steel AISI 1018
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumStainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickStainless 304Steel AISI 1018
Strength against density

Related comparisons