Materials / Compare

Plastic PLA vs. Plastic UHMWPE

Compare Plastic PLA vs. Plastic UHMWPE strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Plastic PLA3D printed (FDM)
Plastic UHMWPEBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength52.5MPasourcetypical20MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield ISO 527, 50 mm/min
Ultimate tensile strength52.5MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield)43MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at break ISO 527, 50 mm/min
Flexural strength96.8MPasourcetypicalnot sourced
Elongation at break7.8%sourcetypical465%sourcetypical, nominal elongation at break ISO 527
Young's modulus (stiffness)3.25GPasourcetypical0.66GPasourcetypical, tensile modulus ISO 527, 1 mm/min
Density1,240kg/m³sourcetypical930kg/m³sourcetypical33% lighter
Strength to weight42.3kN·m/kg1.97x higher21.5kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight2.62MN·m/kg3.69x higher0.71MN·m/kg
Poisson's rationot sourcednot sourced
Shear modulusnot sourcednot sourced
Bulk modulusnot sourcednot sourced
Speed of sound1,619m/s842m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.13W/m·Ksourcebase material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °C0.4W/m·Ksourcetypical, unfilled (narrative value, generic Celanese UHMWPE)
Thermal expansionnot sourced200µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 to 100 °C (generic Celanese UHMWPE)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swingnot sourced1,000µm growth
Specific heat1,200J/kg·Ksourcebase material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °Cnot sourced
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)0.0874mm²/snot sourced
Thermal shock resistancenot sourcednot sourced
Melting point152°Csourcetypical130–138°CsourceDSC 10 K/min
Glass transition59.1°Csourcetypicalnot sourced
Max service temperature58.8°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)80°Csourcerecommended max constant operating temperature
Values forUltimaker PLA, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat) orientation; Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS dated April 20, 2022.Celanese GUR 4120 (avg. molecular weight 4.7x10^6 g/mol), typical values on compression-molded specimens; CTE and thermal conductivity from Celanese's generic UHMWPE guide (grade not named)

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Plastic PLA is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is Plastic PLA stronger than Plastic UHMWPE?

Plastic PLA is stronger: its yield strength is 52.5 MPa against 20 MPa for Plastic UHMWPE (2.63x).

Which is lighter, Plastic PLA or Plastic UHMWPE?

Plastic UHMWPE is lighter: 930 kg/m³ against 1,240 kg/m³ for Plastic PLA.

Which is stiffer, Plastic PLA or Plastic UHMWPE?

Plastic PLA is stiffer: Young's modulus 3.25 GPa against 0.66 GPa for Plastic UHMWPE, so the same part in Plastic PLA deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic PLA or Plastic UHMWPE?

For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic PLA is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must bePlastic PLAPlastic UHMWPE
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter3.69x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter1.66x heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter28% heavier
Strong rod or tielighter1.97x heavier
Strong beamlighter43% heavier
Strong panel or platelighter22% heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Plastic PLA or Plastic UHMWPE?

Plastic UHMWPE conducts heat better: 0.4 W/m·K against 0.13 W/m·K for Plastic PLA.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPlastic PLAPlastic UHMWPE
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPlastic PLAPlastic UHMWPE
Strength against density

Related comparisons