Plastic PBT GF30 vs. Stainless Steel 316

Compare Plastic PBT GF30 vs. Stainless Steel 316 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side

Plastic PBT GF30Bulk polymer (molded or machined)

Mechanical
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser	Open in LessCAD	Open in LessCAD
Yield strength	not given (tensile used)	265MPasourcetypical (representative), annealed 1.0 mm sheet
Ultimate tensile strength	140MPasourcestress at break, 23 °C	583MPasourcetypical (representative), annealed 1.0 mm sheet
Flexural strength	210MPasourcetypical, 23 °C	not sourced
Elongation at break	3%sourcestrain at break, 23 °C	61%sourcetypical (representative), annealed, in 2 in. (51 mm)
Young's modulus (stiffness)	9.8GPasourcetypical, 23 °C	200GPasourcetypical, in tension
Density	1,530kg/m³sourcetypical5.25x lighter	8,027kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight	91.5kN·m/kg2.77x higher	33kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight	6.41MN·m/kg	24.9MN·m/kg3.89x higher
Poisson's ratio	not sourced	0.3sourcedesign value (structural stainless steels)
Shear modulus	not sourced	76.9GPa
Bulk modulus	not sourced	167GPa
Speed of sound	2,531m/s	4,992m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity	0.27W/m·Ksourcetypical (DIN 52612-1)	14.6W/m·Ksource20–100 °C
Thermal expansion	25µm/m·Ksourcelongitudinal (flow), mean 23-55 °C	16.5µm/m·Ksourcemean, 20–100 °C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing	125µm growth	82.5µm growth1.52x less
Specific heat	1,050J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 23 °C	450J/kg·Ksourceat 20 °C
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)	0.168mm²/s	4.04mm²/s24x faster
Thermal shock resistance	not sourced	821W/m
Melting point	223°CsourceDSC (ISO 11357)	1,390–1,440°Csourcemelting range
Max service temperature	205°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa	871–899°Csourceoxidation (scaling) limit in air
Values for	BASF Ultradur B 4300 G6 (PBT, 30% glass fibre), injection moulding grade; product information sheet 09/2026, typical values for uncoloured product at 23 °C.	ATI 316 (UNS S31600), annealed 1.0 mm sheet, ATI technical data sheet (2012); Poisson's ratio from the Nickel Institute/SCI structural stainless design manual

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Plastic PBT GF30 stronger than Stainless Steel 316?

Stainless Steel 316 is stronger: its yield strength is 265 MPa against tensile strength 140 MPa for Plastic PBT GF30 (1.89x).

Which is lighter, Plastic PBT GF30 or Stainless Steel 316?

Plastic PBT GF30 is lighter: 1,530 kg/m³ against 8,027 kg/m³ for Stainless Steel 316.

Which is stiffer, Plastic PBT GF30 or Stainless Steel 316?

Stainless Steel 316 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 9.8 GPa for Plastic PBT GF30, so the same part in Stainless Steel 316 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic PBT GF30 or Stainless Steel 316?

For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic PBT GF30 is lighter for a stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate; Stainless Steel 316 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension).

Part that must be	Plastic PBT GF30	Stainless Steel 316
Stiff rod or tie (tension)	3.89x heavier	lighter
Stiff beam (bending)	lighter	16% heavier
Stiff panel or plate	lighter	1.92x heavier
Strong rod or tie	lighter	2.77x heavier
Strong beam	lighter	3.43x heavier
Strong panel or plate	lighter	3.81x heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Plastic PBT GF30 or Stainless Steel 316?

Stainless Steel 316 conducts heat better: 14.6 W/m·K against 0.27 W/m·K for Plastic PBT GF30.

Which expands less with temperature?

Stainless Steel 316 expands less: 16.5 µm/m·K against 25 µm/m·K for Plastic PBT GF30.

Among 72 materials

Stiffness against density

Strength against density