Materials / Compare
Plastic Polycarbonate vs. Plastic PPS GF40
Compare Plastic Polycarbonate vs. Plastic PPS GF40 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 65MPasourcetypical, tensile yield | not given (tensile used) |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 65MPasourcetypical, stress at break | 195MPasourcetensile strength, 5 mm/min |
| Flexural strength | 97MPasourcetypical, flexural strength | 285MPasourceflexural strength at break |
| Elongation at break | 125%sourcetypical, strain at break | 1.9%sourcestrain at break, 5 mm/min |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 2.4GPasourcetypical | 14.7GPasourcetypical, 1 mm/min |
| Density | 1,200kg/m³sourcetypical38% lighter | 1,650kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 54.2kN·m/kg | 118kN·m/kg2.18x higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 2MN·m/kg | 8.91MN·m/kg4.45x higher |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.38sourcetypical, polycarbonate family (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1) | 0.35sourceglass-reinforced Fortron PPS (class value, not grade-specific) |
| Shear modulus | 0.87GPa | 5.44GPa6.26x stiffer in shear |
| Bulk modulus | 3.33GPa | 16.3GPa |
| Speed of sound | 1,414m/s | 2,985m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 0.2W/m·Ksourcetypical, through-plane, 23 C | 0.2W/m·Ksource40% glass-reinforced Fortron, 25 °C (not grade-specific) |
| Thermal expansion | 65µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 23-55 C, parallel and normal | 12µm/m·Ksourceparallel (flow), mean -50 to 90 °C |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 325µm growth | 60µm growth5.42x less |
| Specific heat | 1,172J/kg·Ksourcetypical (guide value), Bayer ASTM datasheet for Makrolon 2405, ASTM D 2766 | not sourced |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 0.142mm²/s | not sourced |
| Thermal shock resistance | 51.7W/m | 144W/m2.78x more resistant |
| Melting point | not sourced | 280°CsourceDSC, 10 °C/min |
| Glass transition | 144°Csourcetypical, DSC 10 C/min | 90°CsourceDSC, 10 °C/min |
| Max service temperature | 125°CsourceUL 746B RTI, tensile strength, 1.5 mm | 270°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa |
| Values for | Covestro Makrolon 2405 general-purpose PC (MVR 19), Covestro technical datasheet version 2026-09-28, typical values | Celanese Fortron 1140L4 (PPS, 40% glass fibre), injection moulding; FORTRON PPS Short-Term Properties Guide (PPS-012, 2016); thermal conductivity and Poisson for 40% glass-reinforced Fortron from the Fortron PPS Design Manual (PPS-050, 2013). |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Questions
Is Plastic Polycarbonate stronger than Plastic PPS GF40?
Plastic PPS GF40 is stronger: its tensile strength is 195 MPa against yield strength 65 MPa for Plastic Polycarbonate (3x).
Which is lighter, Plastic Polycarbonate or Plastic PPS GF40?
Plastic Polycarbonate is lighter: 1,200 kg/m³ against 1,650 kg/m³ for Plastic PPS GF40.
Which is stiffer, Plastic Polycarbonate or Plastic PPS GF40?
Plastic PPS GF40 is stiffer: Young's modulus 14.7 GPa against 2.4 GPa for Plastic Polycarbonate, so the same part in Plastic PPS GF40 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic Polycarbonate or Plastic PPS GF40?
For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic PPS GF40 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | Plastic Polycarbonate | Plastic PPS GF40 |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 4.45x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 1.8x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | 33% heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | 2.18x heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 1.51x heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 26% heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Plastic Polycarbonate or Plastic PPS GF40?
Plastic Polycarbonate conducts heat better: 0.2 W/m·K against 0.2 W/m·K for Plastic PPS GF40.
Which expands less with temperature?
Plastic PPS GF40 expands less: 12 µm/m·K against 65 µm/m·K for Plastic Polycarbonate.
Among 72 materials
Related comparisons
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Nylon
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. SLA Resin Standard
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. FDM Polycarbonate
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. Plastic POM/Acetal
- Plastic PPS GF40 vs. Plastic PBT GF30
- Plastic PPS GF40 vs. Plastic LCP GF30
- Plastic PPS GF40 vs. Concrete
- Plastic PPS GF40 vs. PCB Laminate FR-4