Materials / Compare
Plastic PPS GF40 vs. Titanium Ti-6Al-4V
Compare Plastic PPS GF40 vs. Titanium Ti-6Al-4V strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | not given (tensile used) | 885MPasourcetypical, plate (>0.187 in), annealed, 0.2% offset |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 195MPasourcetensile strength, 5 mm/min | 940MPasourcetypical, plate, annealed |
| Flexural strength | 285MPasourceflexural strength at break | not sourced |
| Elongation at break | 1.9%sourcestrain at break, 5 mm/min | 16%sourcetypical, in 2 in., plate annealed |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 14.7GPasourcetypical, 1 mm/min | 107–122GPasourcetypical range, 20 °C |
| Density | 1,650kg/m³sourcetypical | 4,430kg/m³sourcenominal |
| Strength to weight | 118kN·m/kg | 200kN·m/kg1.69x higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 8.91MN·m/kg | 25.8MN·m/kg2.9x higher |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.35sourceglass-reinforced Fortron PPS (class value, not grade-specific) | 0.342sourcemean of TIMET measurements |
| Shear modulus | 5.44GPa | 42.7GPa7.84x stiffer in shear |
| Bulk modulus | 16.3GPa | 121GPa |
| Speed of sound | 2,985m/s | 5,084m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 0.2W/m·Ksource40% glass-reinforced Fortron, 25 °C (not grade-specific) | 6.6W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C, mill annealed |
| Thermal expansion | 12µm/m·Ksourceparallel (flow), mean -50 to 90 °C | 9µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 0-100 °C |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 60µm growth | 45µm growth33% less |
| Specific heat | not sourced | 580J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | not sourced | 2.57mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 144W/m | 3,730W/m26x more resistant |
| Melting point | 280°CsourceDSC, 10 °C/min | 1,630–1,650°Csourcemelting range |
| Glass transition | 90°CsourceDSC, 10 °C/min | not sourced |
| Max service temperature | 270°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa | 400°Csourceupper recommended use temperature |
| Values for | Celanese Fortron 1140L4 (PPS, 40% glass fibre), injection moulding; FORTRON PPS Short-Term Properties Guide (PPS-012, 2016); thermal conductivity and Poisson for 40% glass-reinforced Fortron from the Fortron PPS Design Manual (PPS-050, 2013). | TIMETAL 6-4 (Ti-6Al-4V Grade 5) annealed plate typical (TIMET properties manual) + TIMET datasheet TMC-0150 physical properties |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Questions
Is Plastic PPS GF40 stronger than Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?
Titanium Ti-6Al-4V is stronger: its yield strength is 885 MPa against tensile strength 195 MPa for Plastic PPS GF40 (4.54x).
Which is lighter, Plastic PPS GF40 or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?
Plastic PPS GF40 is lighter: 1,650 kg/m³ against 4,430 kg/m³ for Titanium Ti-6Al-4V.
Which is stiffer, Plastic PPS GF40 or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?
Titanium Ti-6Al-4V is stiffer: Young's modulus 115 GPa against 14.7 GPa for Plastic PPS GF40, so the same part in Titanium Ti-6Al-4V deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic PPS GF40 or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?
For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic PPS GF40 is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong panel or plate; Titanium Ti-6Al-4V is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie, strong beam.
| Part that must be | Plastic PPS GF40 | Titanium Ti-6Al-4V |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 2.9x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 4% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 35% heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | 1.69x heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 2% heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 26% heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Plastic PPS GF40 or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?
Titanium Ti-6Al-4V conducts heat better: 6.6 W/m·K against 0.2 W/m·K for Plastic PPS GF40.
Which expands less with temperature?
Titanium Ti-6Al-4V expands less: 9 µm/m·K against 12 µm/m·K for Plastic PPS GF40.
Among 72 materials
Related comparisons
- Plastic PPS GF40 vs. Plastic PBT GF30
- Plastic PPS GF40 vs. Plastic LCP GF30
- Plastic PPS GF40 vs. Concrete
- Plastic PPS GF40 vs. PCB Laminate FR-4
- Titanium Ti-6Al-4V vs. Titanium
- Titanium Ti-6Al-4V vs. DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium
- Titanium Ti-6Al-4V vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Titanium Ti-6Al-4V vs. Steel AISI 4340