Materials / Compare
Plastic Polycarbonate vs. Titanium Ti-6Al-4V
Compare Plastic Polycarbonate vs. Titanium Ti-6Al-4V strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 65MPasourcetypical, tensile yield | 885MPasourcetypical, plate (>0.187 in), annealed, 0.2% offset |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 65MPasourcetypical, stress at break | 940MPasourcetypical, plate, annealed |
| Flexural strength | 97MPasourcetypical, flexural strength | not sourced |
| Elongation at break | 125%sourcetypical, strain at break | 16%sourcetypical, in 2 in., plate annealed |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 2.4GPasourcetypical | 107–122GPasourcetypical range, 20 °C |
| Density | 1,200kg/m³sourcetypical | 4,430kg/m³sourcenominal |
| Strength to weight | 54.2kN·m/kg | 200kN·m/kg3.69x higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 2MN·m/kg | 25.8MN·m/kg12.9x higher |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.38sourcetypical, polycarbonate family (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1) | 0.342sourcemean of TIMET measurements |
| Shear modulus | 0.87GPa | 42.7GPa49.1x stiffer in shear |
| Bulk modulus | 3.33GPa | 121GPa |
| Speed of sound | 1,414m/s | 5,084m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 0.2W/m·Ksourcetypical, through-plane, 23 C | 6.6W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C, mill annealed |
| Thermal expansion | 65µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 23-55 C, parallel and normal | 9µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 0-100 °C |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 325µm growth | 45µm growth7.22x less |
| Specific heat | 1,172J/kg·Ksourcetypical (guide value), Bayer ASTM datasheet for Makrolon 2405, ASTM D 2766 | 580J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 0.142mm²/s | 2.57mm²/s18.1x faster |
| Thermal shock resistance | 51.7W/m | 3,730W/m72.2x more resistant |
| Melting point | not sourced | 1,630–1,650°Csourcemelting range |
| Glass transition | 144°Csourcetypical, DSC 10 C/min | not sourced |
| Max service temperature | 125°CsourceUL 746B RTI, tensile strength, 1.5 mm | 400°Csourceupper recommended use temperature |
| Values for | Covestro Makrolon 2405 general-purpose PC (MVR 19), Covestro technical datasheet version 2026-09-28, typical values | TIMETAL 6-4 (Ti-6Al-4V Grade 5) annealed plate typical (TIMET properties manual) + TIMET datasheet TMC-0150 physical properties |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Questions
Is Plastic Polycarbonate stronger than Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?
Titanium Ti-6Al-4V is stronger: its yield strength is 885 MPa against 65 MPa for Plastic Polycarbonate (13.6x).
Which is lighter, Plastic Polycarbonate or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?
Plastic Polycarbonate is lighter: 1,200 kg/m³ against 4,430 kg/m³ for Titanium Ti-6Al-4V.
Which is stiffer, Plastic Polycarbonate or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?
Titanium Ti-6Al-4V is stiffer: Young's modulus 115 GPa against 2.4 GPa for Plastic Polycarbonate, so the same part in Titanium Ti-6Al-4V deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic Polycarbonate or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?
For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic Polycarbonate is lighter for a stiff panel or plate; Titanium Ti-6Al-4V is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie, strong beam.
| Part that must be | Plastic Polycarbonate | Titanium Ti-6Al-4V |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 12.9x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 1.87x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 2% heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | 3.69x heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 1.54x heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | about equal | about equal |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Plastic Polycarbonate or Titanium Ti-6Al-4V?
Titanium Ti-6Al-4V conducts heat better: 6.6 W/m·K against 0.2 W/m·K for Plastic Polycarbonate.
Which expands less with temperature?
Titanium Ti-6Al-4V expands less: 9 µm/m·K against 65 µm/m·K for Plastic Polycarbonate.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Nylon
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. SLA Resin Standard
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. FDM Polycarbonate
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. Plastic POM/Acetal
- Titanium Ti-6Al-4V vs. Titanium
- Titanium Ti-6Al-4V vs. DMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI Titanium
- Titanium Ti-6Al-4V vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Titanium Ti-6Al-4V vs. Steel AISI 4340