Materials / Compare

Solder SAC305 vs. Steel A992

Compare Solder SAC305 vs. Steel A992 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Solder SAC305Cast
Steel A992Wrought
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength22MPasourcetypical385MPasourcetypical: mean of 20,295 A992 flange mill-test coupons (1998 SSPC survey), as reported by AISC
Ultimate tensile strength39.6MPasourcetypical505MPasourcetypical: mean of 20,295 A992 flange mill-test coupons (1998 SSPC survey)
Elongation at break49%sourcetypicalnot sourced
Young's modulus (stiffness)6.9GPasourcetypical, temperature and strain rate not stated200GPasourcedesign value (AISC 360-16)
Density7,350kg/m³sourcetypical7,850kg/m³sourcenominal (constructional data)
Strength to weight2.99kN·m/kg49kN·m/kg16.4x higher
Stiffness to weight0.939MN·m/kg25.5MN·m/kg27.1x higher
Poisson's ratio0.35sourcetypical0.3sourcedesign value (AISC 360-16 Commentary)
Shear modulus2.56GPa76.9GPa30.1x stiffer in shear
Bulk modulus7.67GPa167GPa
Speed of sound969m/s5,048m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity61W/m·Ksourcetypical, temperature not stated48W/m·Ksourcenominal at 20 °C
Thermal expansion21.9µm/m·Ksourcemean, 20-100 °C (MacDermid Alpha)12µm/m·Ksourcenominal (constructional data, no temperature range stated)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing110µm growth60µm growth1.82x less
Specific heat232J/kg·Ksourcetypical (MacDermid Alpha)460–480J/kg·Ksourcebase material: EN S275JR unalloyed structural steel (the EN counterpart of A36), typical, 50/100 °C
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)35.8mm²/s2.75x faster13mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance5,773W/m7% more resistant5,390W/m
Melting point217–220°Csourcesolidus-liquidusnot sourced
Values forSAC305 (Sn96.5Ag3.0Cu0.5) solder alloy, bulk; Indium Corporation Indalloy 256 (SAC305) for Preforms product data sheet (Form No. 100346 R0, 2024), selected properties, test temperature not stated; expansion and specific heat from MacDermid Alpha VACULOY SAC TDS (06 September 2023).ASTM A992 W-shapes; Fy/Fu specified minimums from AISC publications (AISC 360-16 Commentary; Modern Steel Construction); elastic constants AISC 360; physical constants from the bauforumstahl structural-steel EPD, which names A992 among covered product standards.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Solder SAC305 stronger than Steel A992?

Steel A992 is stronger: its yield strength is 385 MPa against 22 MPa for Solder SAC305 (17.5x).

Which is lighter, Solder SAC305 or Steel A992?

Solder SAC305 is lighter: 7,350 kg/m³ against 7,850 kg/m³ for Steel A992.

Which is stiffer, Solder SAC305 or Steel A992?

Steel A992 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 6.9 GPa for Solder SAC305, so the same part in Steel A992 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Solder SAC305 or Steel A992?

For the same stiffness or strength: Steel A992 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beSolder SAC305Steel A992
Stiff rod or tie (tension)27.1x heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)5.04x heavierlighter
Stiff panel or plate2.88x heavierlighter
Strong rod or tie16.4x heavierlighter
Strong beam6.31x heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate3.92x heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Solder SAC305 or Steel A992?

Solder SAC305 conducts heat better: 61 W/m·K against 48 W/m·K for Steel A992.

Which expands less with temperature?

Steel A992 expands less: 12 µm/m·K against 21.9 µm/m·K for Solder SAC305.

Among 72 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Ceramic Aluminum NitrideAluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DPlastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Solder SAC305Steel A992
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Aluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DPlastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Solder SAC305Steel A992
Strength against density

Related comparisons