Materials / Compare

Stainless 304 vs. Plastic UHMWPE

Compare Stainless 304 vs. Plastic UHMWPE strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Stainless 304Wrought
Plastic UHMWPEBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength241MPasourcetypical, annealed, 70 °F (21 °C)20MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield ISO 527, 50 mm/min
Ultimate tensile strength586MPasourcetypical, annealed, 70 °F (21 °C)43MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at break ISO 527, 50 mm/min
Elongation at break55%sourcetypical, annealed, in 2 in. (50.8 mm)465%sourcetypical, nominal elongation at break ISO 527
Young's modulus (stiffness)193GPasourcetypical, in tension0.66GPasourcetypical, tensile modulus ISO 527, 1 mm/min
Density8,030kg/m³sourcetypical930kg/m³sourcetypical8.63x lighter
Strength to weight30kN·m/kg40% higher21.5kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight24MN·m/kg33.9x higher0.71MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.3sourcedesign value (structural stainless steels)not sourced
Shear modulus74.2GPanot sourced
Bulk modulus161GPanot sourced
Speed of sound4,903m/s842m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity16.2W/m·Ksourceat 100 °C0.4W/m·Ksourcetypical, unfilled (narrative value, generic Celanese UHMWPE)
Thermal expansion16.9µm/m·Ksourcemean, 0–100 °C200µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 to 100 °C (generic Celanese UHMWPE)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing84.5µm growth11.8x less1,000µm growth
Specific heat500J/kg·Ksourcemean, 0–100 °Cnot sourced
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)4.03mm²/snot sourced
Thermal shock resistance838W/mnot sourced
Melting point1,399–1,454°Csourcemelting range130–138°CsourceDSC 10 K/min
Max service temperature899°Csourcecontinuous, oxidation (scaling) limit in air80°Csourcerecommended max constant operating temperature
Values forType 304, annealed flat-rolled (Cleveland-Cliffs 304/304L Product Data Bulletin, May 2021); Poisson's ratio from the Nickel Institute/SCI structural stainless design manualCelanese GUR 4120 (avg. molecular weight 4.7x10^6 g/mol), typical values on compression-molded specimens; CTE and thermal conductivity from Celanese's generic UHMWPE guide (grade not named)

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Stainless 304 stronger than Plastic UHMWPE?

Stainless 304 is stronger: its yield strength is 241 MPa against 20 MPa for Plastic UHMWPE (12.1x).

Which is lighter, Stainless 304 or Plastic UHMWPE?

Plastic UHMWPE is lighter: 930 kg/m³ against 8,030 kg/m³ for Stainless 304.

Which is stiffer, Stainless 304 or Plastic UHMWPE?

Stainless 304 is stiffer: Young's modulus 193 GPa against 0.66 GPa for Plastic UHMWPE, so the same part in Stainless 304 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Stainless 304 or Plastic UHMWPE?

For the same stiffness or strength: Stainless 304 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie; Plastic UHMWPE is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beStainless 304Plastic UHMWPE
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter33.9x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter1.98x heavier
Stiff panel or plate30% heavierlighter
Strong rod or tielighter40% heavier
Strong beam1.64x heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate2.49x heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Stainless 304 or Plastic UHMWPE?

Stainless 304 conducts heat better: 16.2 W/m·K against 0.4 W/m·K for Plastic UHMWPE.

Which expands less with temperature?

Stainless 304 expands less: 16.9 µm/m·K against 200 µm/m·K for Plastic UHMWPE.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelStainless 304Plastic UHMWPE
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickStainless 304Plastic UHMWPE
Strength against density

Related comparisons