Materials / Compare

Steel AISI 4340 vs. Plastic UHMWPE

Compare Steel AISI 4340 vs. Plastic UHMWPE strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Steel AISI 4340Wrought
Plastic UHMWPEBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength1,035MPasourcetypical, transverse20MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield ISO 527, 50 mm/min
Ultimate tensile strength1,140MPasourcetypical, transverse43MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at break ISO 527, 50 mm/min
Elongation at break18%sourcetypical, transverse465%sourcetypical, nominal elongation at break ISO 527
Young's modulus (stiffness)200GPasourceMIL-HDBK-5J design value (AISI 4340, quenched and tempered)0.66GPasourcetypical, tensile modulus ISO 527, 1 mm/min
Density7,840kg/m³sourcetypical930kg/m³sourcetypical8.43x lighter
Strength to weight132kN·m/kg6.14x higher21.5kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight25.5MN·m/kg35.9x higher0.71MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.32sourceMIL-HDBK-5J design value (AISI 4340, quenched and tempered)not sourced
Shear modulus75.7GPanot sourced
Bulk modulus185GPanot sourced
Speed of sound5,049m/s842m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity37.5W/m·Ksourcetypical0.4W/m·Ksourcetypical, unfilled (narrative value, generic Celanese UHMWPE)
Thermal expansion11.3µm/m·Ksourcemean, -18 to 93 °C200µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 to 100 °C (generic Celanese UHMWPE)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing56.5µm growth17.7x less1,000µm growth
Specific heat448J/kg·Ksourcetypicalnot sourced
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)10.7mm²/snot sourced
Thermal shock resistance11,678W/mnot sourced
Melting pointnot sourced130–138°CsourceDSC 10 K/min
Max service temperaturenot sourced80°Csourcerecommended max constant operating temperature
Values forCarpenter (Latrobe) Lescalloy 4340 VAC-ARC datasheet; mechanical row for 1100 °F temper; physical properties grade-levelCelanese GUR 4120 (avg. molecular weight 4.7x10^6 g/mol), typical values on compression-molded specimens; CTE and thermal conductivity from Celanese's generic UHMWPE guide (grade not named)

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Steel AISI 4340 stronger than Plastic UHMWPE?

Steel AISI 4340 is stronger: its yield strength is 1,035 MPa against 20 MPa for Plastic UHMWPE (51.8x).

Which is lighter, Steel AISI 4340 or Plastic UHMWPE?

Plastic UHMWPE is lighter: 930 kg/m³ against 7,840 kg/m³ for Steel AISI 4340.

Which is stiffer, Steel AISI 4340 or Plastic UHMWPE?

Steel AISI 4340 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 0.66 GPa for Plastic UHMWPE, so the same part in Steel AISI 4340 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Steel AISI 4340 or Plastic UHMWPE?

For the same stiffness or strength: Steel AISI 4340 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie, strong beam; Plastic UHMWPE is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beSteel AISI 4340Plastic UHMWPE
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter35.9x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter2.06x heavier
Stiff panel or plate26% heavierlighter
Strong rod or tielighter6.14x heavier
Strong beamlighter1.65x heavier
Strong panel or plate17% heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Steel AISI 4340 or Plastic UHMWPE?

Steel AISI 4340 conducts heat better: 37.5 W/m·K against 0.4 W/m·K for Plastic UHMWPE.

Which expands less with temperature?

Steel AISI 4340 expands less: 11.3 µm/m·K against 200 µm/m·K for Plastic UHMWPE.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelSteel AISI 4340Plastic UHMWPE
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickSteel AISI 4340Plastic UHMWPE
Strength against density

Related comparisons