Aluminum 1100-O vs. Solder SAC305

Compare Aluminum 1100-O vs. Solder SAC305 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side

Mechanical
Try it on a partA sample part to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser	Open in LessCAD	Open in LessCAD
Yield strength	35MPasourcetypical, O, 0.0625 in specimen	22MPasourcetypical
Ultimate tensile strength	90MPasourcetypical, O	39.6MPasourcetypical
Elongation at break	35%sourcetypical, O, in 4D	49%sourcetypical
Young's modulus (stiffness)	69GPasourcetypical	6.9GPasourcetypical, temperature and strain rate not stated
Density	2,710kg/m³sourcenominal, 20 °C	7,350kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight	12.9kN·m/kg4.31x higher	2.99kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight	25.5MN·m/kg27.1x higher	0.939MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio	not sourced	0.35sourcetypical
Shear modulus	not sourced	2.56GPa
Bulk modulus	not sourced	7.67GPa
Speed of sound	5,046m/s	969m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity	222W/m·Ksourcetypical, O, 20 °C	61W/m·Ksourcetypical, temperature not stated
Thermal expansion	23.6µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-100 °C	21.9µm/m·Ksourcemean, 20-100 °C (MacDermid Alpha)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing	118µm growth	110µm growth8% less
Specific heat	901J/kg·Ksourcebase material: commercially pure aluminium EN AW-1050A (Hydro), 20 °C	232J/kg·Ksourcetypical (MacDermid Alpha)
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)	90.9mm²/s2.54x faster	35.8mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance	not sourced	5,773W/m
Melting point	640–655°Csourcemelting range	217–220°Csourcesolidus-liquidus
Values for	1100-O (annealed) commercially pure aluminium, Kaiser Aluminum Tube & Pipe Alloy 1100 Technical Data (Rev. 05/06), typical properties; specific heat from Hydro EN AW-1050A (99.5% Al) extruded-products datasheet (10/2018).	SAC305 (Sn96.5Ag3.0Cu0.5) solder alloy, bulk; Indium Corporation Indalloy 256 (SAC305) for Preforms product data sheet (Form No. 100346 R0, 2024), selected properties, test temperature not stated; expansion and specific heat from MacDermid Alpha VACULOY SAC TDS (06 September 2023).

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Aluminum 1100-O stronger than Solder SAC305?

Aluminum 1100-O is stronger: its yield strength is 35 MPa against 22 MPa for Solder SAC305 (1.59x).

Which is lighter, Aluminum 1100-O or Solder SAC305?

Aluminum 1100-O is lighter: 2,710 kg/m³ against 7,350 kg/m³ for Solder SAC305.

Which is stiffer, Aluminum 1100-O or Solder SAC305?

Aluminum 1100-O is stiffer: Young's modulus 69 GPa against 6.9 GPa for Solder SAC305, so the same part in Aluminum 1100-O deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Aluminum 1100-O or Solder SAC305?

For the same stiffness or strength: Aluminum 1100-O is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must be	Aluminum 1100-O	Solder SAC305
Stiff rod or tie (tension)	lighter	27.1x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)	lighter	8.58x heavier
Stiff panel or plate	lighter	5.84x heavier
Strong rod or tie	lighter	4.31x heavier
Strong beam	lighter	3.7x heavier
Strong panel or plate	lighter	3.42x heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Aluminum 1100-O or Solder SAC305?

Aluminum 1100-O conducts heat better: 222 W/m·K against 61 W/m·K for Solder SAC305.

Which expands less with temperature?

Solder SAC305 expands less: 21.9 µm/m·K against 23.6 µm/m·K for Aluminum 1100-O.

Among 72 materials

Stiffness against density

Strength against density