Materials / Compare

Aluminum 2024-T351 vs. Solder SAC305

Compare Aluminum 2024-T351 vs. Solder SAC305 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Aluminum 2024-T351Wrought
Solder SAC305Cast
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength324MPasourcetypical, 0.2% offset, .500 in dia specimen22MPasourcetypical
Ultimate tensile strength469MPasourcetypical11.8x stronger39.6MPasourcetypical
Elongation at break19%sourcetypical, in 4D49%sourcetypical
Young's modulus (stiffness)73.1GPasourcetypical6.9GPasourcetypical, temperature and strain rate not stated
Density2,770kg/m³sourcenominal7,350kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight117kN·m/kg39.1x higher2.99kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight26.4MN·m/kg28.1x higher0.939MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.33sourcetypical (handbook physical constant), all tempers0.35sourcetypical
Shear modulus27.5GPa10.8x stiffer in shear2.56GPa
Bulk modulus71.7GPa7.67GPa
Speed of sound5,137m/s969m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity120W/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 °C61W/m·Ksourcetypical, temperature not stated
Thermal expansion22.9µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 20-100 °C21.9µm/m·Ksourcemean, 20-100 °C (MacDermid Alpha)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing115µm growth110µm growth5% less
Specific heat875J/kg·Ksourcetypical, at 100 °C232J/kg·Ksourcetypical (MacDermid Alpha)
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)49.5mm²/s38% faster35.8mm²/s
Thermal shock resistance15,561W/m2.7x more resistant5,773W/m
Melting point502–638°Csourcemelting range217–220°Csourcesolidus-liquidus
Values for2024-T4/T351, Kaiser Aluminum sheet, coil & plate typical datasheet; Poisson from MIL-HDBK-5JSAC305 (Sn96.5Ag3.0Cu0.5) solder alloy, bulk; Indium Corporation Indalloy 256 (SAC305) for Preforms product data sheet (Form No. 100346 R0, 2024), selected properties, test temperature not stated; expansion and specific heat from MacDermid Alpha VACULOY SAC TDS (06 September 2023).

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Aluminum 2024-T351 stronger than Solder SAC305?

Aluminum 2024-T351 is stronger: its yield strength is 324 MPa against 22 MPa for Solder SAC305 (14.7x).

Which is lighter, Aluminum 2024-T351 or Solder SAC305?

Aluminum 2024-T351 is lighter: 2,770 kg/m³ against 7,350 kg/m³ for Solder SAC305.

Which is stiffer, Aluminum 2024-T351 or Solder SAC305?

Aluminum 2024-T351 is stiffer: Young's modulus 73.1 GPa against 6.9 GPa for Solder SAC305, so the same part in Aluminum 2024-T351 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Aluminum 2024-T351 or Solder SAC305?

For the same stiffness or strength: Aluminum 2024-T351 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beAluminum 2024-T351Solder SAC305
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter28.1x heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter8.64x heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter5.83x heavier
Strong rod or tielighter39.1x heavier
Strong beamlighter15.9x heavier
Strong panel or platelighter10.2x heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Aluminum 2024-T351 or Solder SAC305?

Aluminum 2024-T351 conducts heat better: 120 W/m·K against 61 W/m·K for Solder SAC305.

Which expands less with temperature?

Solder SAC305 expands less: 21.9 µm/m·K against 22.9 µm/m·K for Aluminum 2024-T351.

Among 72 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Ceramic Aluminum NitrideAluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DPlastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Aluminum 2024-T351Solder SAC305
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Aluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DPlastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Aluminum 2024-T351Solder SAC305
Strength against density

Related comparisons