Materials / Compare

FDM ASA vs. Plastic Polycarbonate

Compare FDM ASA vs. Plastic Polycarbonate strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
FDM ASA3D printed (FDM)
Plastic PolycarbonateBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strengthnot given (tensile used)65MPasourcetypical, tensile yield
Ultimate tensile strength37MPasourcetypical65MPasourcetypical, stress at break
Flexural strength65MPasourcetypical97MPasourcetypical, flexural strength
Elongation at break9.2%sourcetypical125%sourcetypical, strain at break
Young's modulus (stiffness)2.45GPasourcetypical2.4GPasourcetypical
Density1,050kg/m³sourcetypical14% lighter1,200kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight35.2kN·m/kg54.2kN·m/kg1.54x higher
Stiffness to weight2.33MN·m/kg17% higher2MN·m/kg
Poisson's rationot sourced0.38sourcetypical, polycarbonate family (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1)
Shear modulusnot sourced0.87GPa
Bulk modulusnot sourced3.33GPa
Speed of sound1,528m/s1,414m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.17W/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution Luran S 777K injection-molding ASA, typical0.2W/m·Ksourcetypical, through-plane, 23 C
Thermal expansion80–110µm/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution Luran S 777K injection-molding ASA, range65µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 23-55 C, parallel and normal
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing475µm growth325µm growth46% less
Specific heatnot sourced1,172J/kg·Ksourcetypical (guide value), Bayer ASTM datasheet for Makrolon 2405, ASTM D 2766
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)not sourced0.142mm²/s
Thermal shock resistancenot sourced51.7W/m
Glass transitionnot sourced144°Csourcetypical, DSC 10 C/min
Max service temperature92°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa125°CsourceUL 746B RTI, tensile strength, 1.5 mm
Values forBambu Lab ASA, TDS V3.0, printed specimens X-Y; nozzle 260 °C, bed 80 °C, 200 mm/s, 100% infill; annealed and dried 80 °C for 12 h before testing.Covestro Makrolon 2405 general-purpose PC (MVR 19), Covestro technical datasheet version 2026-09-28, typical values

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

FDM ASA is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is FDM ASA stronger than Plastic Polycarbonate?

Plastic Polycarbonate is stronger: its yield strength is 65 MPa against tensile strength 37 MPa for FDM ASA (1.76x).

Which is lighter, FDM ASA or Plastic Polycarbonate?

FDM ASA is lighter: 1,050 kg/m³ against 1,200 kg/m³ for Plastic Polycarbonate.

Which is stiffer, FDM ASA or Plastic Polycarbonate?

FDM ASA is stiffer: Young's modulus 2.45 GPa against 2.4 GPa for Plastic Polycarbonate, so the same part in FDM ASA deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, FDM ASA or Plastic Polycarbonate?

For the same stiffness or strength: FDM ASA is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate; Plastic Polycarbonate is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beFDM ASAPlastic Polycarbonate
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter17% heavier
Stiff beam (bending)lighter15% heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter15% heavier
Strong rod or tie1.54x heavierlighter
Strong beam27% heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate16% heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, FDM ASA or Plastic Polycarbonate?

Plastic Polycarbonate conducts heat better: 0.2 W/m·K against 0.17 W/m·K for FDM ASA.

Which expands less with temperature?

Plastic Polycarbonate expands less: 65 µm/m·K against 95 µm/m·K for FDM ASA.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelFDM ASAPlastic Polycarbonate
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickFDM ASAPlastic Polycarbonate
Strength against density

Related comparisons