Materials / Compare

Brick vs. DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum

Compare Brick vs. DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
BrickNatural
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum3D printed metal (DMLS)
Try it on a partA sample part to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strengthnot given (tensile used)270MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal
Ultimate tensile strength5.1MPasourcemodulus of rupture (no direct tensile value)450MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal
Compressive strength77.9MPasourcemean unit compressive strength, solid extruded brick (survey mean; SD 30.8 MPa)not sourced
Elongation at breaknot sourced10.2%sourcetypical at break, as manufactured, horizontal
Young's modulus (stiffness)not sourced72GPasourcesame material and process, different machine maker: Renishaw RenAM 500, 30 µm, as built, horizontal (XY)
Density2,082kg/m³sourceface brick density row used for k (BIA notes most fired clay brick 120-130 lb/ft3)2,670kg/m³sourcetypical part density (ISO 3369), EOS M 290, AlSi10Mg_030_FlexM291 (30 µm)
Strength to weight2.45kN·m/kg101kN·m/kg41.3x higher
Stiffness to weightnot sourced27MN·m/kg
Poisson's rationot sourced0.33sourcebase material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (Al-9Si-0.6Mg, closest MIL-HDBK-5J alloy to AlSi10Mg / EN AC-43000)
Shear modulusnot sourced27.1GPa
Bulk modulusnot sourced70.6GPa
Speed of soundnot sourced5,193m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.92–1.12W/m·Ksourcerange for 130 lb/ft3 face brick (ASHRAE 2013 via BIA)110W/m·Ksourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal (ISO 22007-2)
Thermal expansion7.2µm/m·KsourceTMS Code average coefficient, clay/shale unit masonry20µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing36µm growth2.78x less100µm growth
Specific heat837J/kg·Ksourcevalue used in BIA heat-capacity sample calculation963J/kg·Ksourcebase material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (MIL-HDBK-5J), at 100 °C
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)0.585mm²/s42.8mm²/s73.1x faster
Thermal shock resistancenot sourced13,819W/m
Values forSolid extruded clay/shale brick units (BIA 1993 manufacturer survey, TN 3A 2024); face brick of 130 lb/ft3 for thermal properties (BIA TN 4, from ASHRAE 2013); CTE is the TMS Code value for clay/shale masonryEOS Aluminium AlSi10Mg (powder 9011-0024), EOS M 290 | 30 µm process (AlSi10Mg_FlexM291 2.01), as manufactured, horizontal; machined (turned) specimens, ISO 6892-1 B10

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is Brick stronger than DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum?

DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is stronger: its yield strength is 270 MPa against tensile strength 5.1 MPa for Brick (52.9x).

Which is lighter, Brick or DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum?

Brick is lighter: 2,082 kg/m³ against 2,670 kg/m³ for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum.

Which is lighter for the same job, Brick or DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum?

For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beBrickDMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum
Strong rod or tie41.3x heavierlighter
Strong beam11x heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate5.67x heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Brick or DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum?

DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum conducts heat better: 110 W/m·K against 1.02 W/m·K for Brick.

Which expands less with temperature?

Brick expands less: 7.2 µm/m·K against 20 µm/m·K for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelDMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickDMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum
Strength against density

Related comparisons