Materials / Compare

Brick vs. Plastic PPS GF40

Compare Brick vs. Plastic PPS GF40 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
BrickNatural
Plastic PPS GF40Bulk polymer (molded or machined)
Try it on a partA sample part to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strengthnot given (tensile used)not given (tensile used)
Ultimate tensile strength5.1MPasourcemodulus of rupture (no direct tensile value)195MPasourcetensile strength, 5 mm/min
Compressive strength77.9MPasourcemean unit compressive strength, solid extruded brick (survey mean; SD 30.8 MPa)not sourced
Flexural strengthnot sourced285MPasourceflexural strength at break
Elongation at breaknot sourced1.9%sourcestrain at break, 5 mm/min
Young's modulus (stiffness)not sourced14.7GPasourcetypical, 1 mm/min
Density2,082kg/m³sourceface brick density row used for k (BIA notes most fired clay brick 120-130 lb/ft3)1,650kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight2.45kN·m/kg118kN·m/kg48.2x higher
Stiffness to weightnot sourced8.91MN·m/kg
Poisson's rationot sourced0.35sourceglass-reinforced Fortron PPS (class value, not grade-specific)
Shear modulusnot sourced5.44GPa
Bulk modulusnot sourced16.3GPa
Speed of soundnot sourced2,985m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.92–1.12W/m·Ksourcerange for 130 lb/ft3 face brick (ASHRAE 2013 via BIA)0.2W/m·Ksource40% glass-reinforced Fortron, 25 °C (not grade-specific)
Thermal expansion7.2µm/m·KsourceTMS Code average coefficient, clay/shale unit masonry12µm/m·Ksourceparallel (flow), mean -50 to 90 °C
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing36µm growth1.67x less60µm growth
Specific heat837J/kg·Ksourcevalue used in BIA heat-capacity sample calculationnot sourced
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)0.585mm²/snot sourced
Thermal shock resistancenot sourced144W/m
Melting pointnot sourced280°CsourceDSC, 10 °C/min
Glass transitionnot sourced90°CsourceDSC, 10 °C/min
Max service temperaturenot sourced270°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa
Values forSolid extruded clay/shale brick units (BIA 1993 manufacturer survey, TN 3A 2024); face brick of 130 lb/ft3 for thermal properties (BIA TN 4, from ASHRAE 2013); CTE is the TMS Code value for clay/shale masonryCelanese Fortron 1140L4 (PPS, 40% glass fibre), injection moulding; FORTRON PPS Short-Term Properties Guide (PPS-012, 2016); thermal conductivity and Poisson for 40% glass-reinforced Fortron from the Fortron PPS Design Manual (PPS-050, 2013).

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Brick stronger than Plastic PPS GF40?

Plastic PPS GF40 is stronger: its tensile strength is 195 MPa against 5.1 MPa for Brick (38.2x).

Which is lighter, Brick or Plastic PPS GF40?

Plastic PPS GF40 is lighter: 1,650 kg/m³ against 2,082 kg/m³ for Brick.

Which is lighter for the same job, Brick or Plastic PPS GF40?

For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic PPS GF40 is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beBrickPlastic PPS GF40
Strong rod or tie48.2x heavierlighter
Strong beam14.3x heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate7.8x heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Brick or Plastic PPS GF40?

Brick conducts heat better: 1.02 W/m·K against 0.2 W/m·K for Plastic PPS GF40.

Which expands less with temperature?

Brick expands less: 7.2 µm/m·K against 12 µm/m·K for Plastic PPS GF40.

Among 72 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Ceramic Aluminum NitrideAluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DSolder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic LCP GF30Plastic PPS GF40
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Aluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DSolder SAC305Plastic PBT GF30Plastic LCP GF30BrickPlastic PPS GF40
Strength against density

Related comparisons