Materials / Compare

Brick vs. Solder SAC305

Compare Brick vs. Solder SAC305 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
BrickNatural
Solder SAC305Cast
Try it on a partA sample part to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strengthnot given (tensile used)22MPasourcetypical
Ultimate tensile strength5.1MPasourcemodulus of rupture (no direct tensile value)39.6MPasourcetypical
Compressive strength77.9MPasourcemean unit compressive strength, solid extruded brick (survey mean; SD 30.8 MPa)not sourced
Elongation at breaknot sourced49%sourcetypical
Young's modulus (stiffness)not sourced6.9GPasourcetypical, temperature and strain rate not stated
Density2,082kg/m³sourceface brick density row used for k (BIA notes most fired clay brick 120-130 lb/ft3)7,350kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight2.45kN·m/kg2.99kN·m/kg22% higher
Stiffness to weightnot sourced0.939MN·m/kg
Poisson's rationot sourced0.35sourcetypical
Shear modulusnot sourced2.56GPa
Bulk modulusnot sourced7.67GPa
Speed of soundnot sourced969m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.92–1.12W/m·Ksourcerange for 130 lb/ft3 face brick (ASHRAE 2013 via BIA)61W/m·Ksourcetypical, temperature not stated
Thermal expansion7.2µm/m·KsourceTMS Code average coefficient, clay/shale unit masonry21.9µm/m·Ksourcemean, 20-100 °C (MacDermid Alpha)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing36µm growth3.04x less110µm growth
Specific heat837J/kg·Ksourcevalue used in BIA heat-capacity sample calculation232J/kg·Ksourcetypical (MacDermid Alpha)
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)0.585mm²/s35.8mm²/s61.1x faster
Thermal shock resistancenot sourced5,773W/m
Melting pointnot sourced217–220°Csourcesolidus-liquidus
Values forSolid extruded clay/shale brick units (BIA 1993 manufacturer survey, TN 3A 2024); face brick of 130 lb/ft3 for thermal properties (BIA TN 4, from ASHRAE 2013); CTE is the TMS Code value for clay/shale masonrySAC305 (Sn96.5Ag3.0Cu0.5) solder alloy, bulk; Indium Corporation Indalloy 256 (SAC305) for Preforms product data sheet (Form No. 100346 R0, 2024), selected properties, test temperature not stated; expansion and specific heat from MacDermid Alpha VACULOY SAC TDS (06 September 2023).

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Brick stronger than Solder SAC305?

Solder SAC305 is stronger: its yield strength is 22 MPa against tensile strength 5.1 MPa for Brick (4.31x).

Which is lighter, Brick or Solder SAC305?

Brick is lighter: 2,082 kg/m³ against 7,350 kg/m³ for Solder SAC305.

Which is lighter for the same job, Brick or Solder SAC305?

For the same stiffness or strength: Brick is lighter for a strong beam, strong panel or plate; Solder SAC305 is lighter for a strong rod or tie.

Part that must beBrickSolder SAC305
Strong rod or tie22% heavierlighter
Strong beamlighter33% heavier
Strong panel or platelighter1.7x heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Brick or Solder SAC305?

Solder SAC305 conducts heat better: 61 W/m·K against 1.02 W/m·K for Brick.

Which expands less with temperature?

Brick expands less: 7.2 µm/m·K against 21.9 µm/m·K for Solder SAC305.

Among 72 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Ceramic Aluminum NitrideAluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DPlastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Solder SAC305
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Aluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DPlastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30BrickSolder SAC305
Strength against density

Related comparisons