DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum

Compare DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side

DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel3D printed metal (DMLS)

DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum3D printed metal (DMLS)

Mechanical
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser	Open in LessCAD	Open in LessCAD
Yield strength	861MPasourcemean, as built, horizontal (N=72)	270MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal
Ultimate tensile strength	886MPasourcemean, as built, horizontal (N=72)	450MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal
Elongation at break	19.9%sourcemean at break, as built, horizontal	10.2%sourcetypical at break, as manufactured, horizontal
Young's modulus (stiffness)	197GPasourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900 (Cleveland-Cliffs)	72GPasourcesame material and process, different machine maker: Renishaw RenAM 500, 30 µm, as built, horizontal (XY)
Density	7,790kg/m³sourcemean part density (ISO 3369)	2,670kg/m³sourcetypical part density (ISO 3369), EOS M 290, AlSi10Mg_030_FlexM291 (30 µm)
Strength to weight	110kN·m/kg9% higher	101kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight	25.3MN·m/kg	27MN·m/kg7% higher
Poisson's ratio	0.272sourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, all conditions (Cleveland-Cliffs)	0.33sourcebase material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (Al-9Si-0.6Mg, closest MIL-HDBK-5J alloy to AlSi10Mg / EN AC-43000)
Shear modulus	77.4GPa2.86x stiffer in shear	27.1GPa
Bulk modulus	144GPa	70.6GPa
Speed of sound	5,029m/s	5,193m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity	17.9W/m·Ksourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900, at 149 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs)	110W/m·Ksourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal (ISO 22007-2)
Thermal expansion	10.4µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228, AFTER atmospheric heat treatment (as-built value not published)	20µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing	52µm growth1.92x less	100µm growth
Specific heat	460J/kg·Ksourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition A, 0-100 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs)	963J/kg·Ksourcebase material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (MIL-HDBK-5J), at 100 °C
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)	5mm²/s	42.8mm²/s8.56x faster
Thermal shock resistance	5,474W/m	13,819W/m2.52x more resistant
Values for	EOS StainlessSteel 17-4PH IndustryLine (powder 9011-0041), EOS M 290, 40 µm, default job 17-4PH_040_StainlessM291_100, as built, horizontal; ISO 6892 & ASTM E8M	EOS Aluminium AlSi10Mg (powder 9011-0024), EOS M 290 \| 30 µm process (AlSi10Mg_FlexM291 2.01), as manufactured, horizontal; machined (turned) specimens, ISO 6892-1 B10

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel and DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum are 3D printed: their properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel stronger than DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum?

DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is stronger: its yield strength is 861 MPa against 270 MPa for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum (3.19x).

Which is lighter, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum?

DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is lighter: 2,670 kg/m³ against 7,790 kg/m³ for DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel.

Which is stiffer, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum?

DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is stiffer: Young's modulus 197 GPa against 72 GPa for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum, so the same part in DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum?

For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is lighter for a strong rod or tie; DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must be	DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel	DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum
Stiff rod or tie (tension)	7% heavier	lighter
Stiff beam (bending)	1.76x heavier	lighter
Stiff panel or plate	2.09x heavier	lighter
Strong rod or tie	lighter	9% heavier
Strong beam	35% heavier	lighter
Strong panel or plate	1.63x heavier	lighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum?

DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum conducts heat better: 110 W/m·K against 17.9 W/m·K for DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel.

Which expands less with temperature?

DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel expands less: 10.4 µm/m·K against 20 µm/m·K for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum.

Among 59 materials

Stiffness against density

Strength against density