Materials / Compare
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum
Compare DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 530MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal1.96x stronger | 270MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 640MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal42% stronger | 450MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal |
| Elongation at break | 40%sourcetypical at break, as manufactured, horizontal3.92x more ductile | 10.2%sourcetypical at break, as manufactured, horizontal |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 185GPasourcetypical, as built, horizontal (XY); EOSINT M280-400W / M290-400W, 316L_Surface 1.0, 20 µm (2014 sheet) | 72GPasourcesame material and process, different machine maker: Renishaw RenAM 500, 30 µm, as built, horizontal (XY) |
| Density | 7,900kg/m³sourcepart density (ISO 3369, not labelled min or typical), EOS M 290, 40 µm FlexLine | 2,670kg/m³sourcetypical part density (ISO 3369), EOS M 290, AlSi10Mg_030_FlexM291 (30 µm) |
| Strength to weight | 67.1kN·m/kg | 101kN·m/kg1.51x higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 23.4MN·m/kg | 27MN·m/kg15% higher |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.3sourcebase material: austenitic stainless steels incl. 1.4404 (316L), design value | 0.33sourcebase material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (Al-9Si-0.6Mg, closest MIL-HDBK-5J alloy to AlSi10Mg / EN AC-43000) |
| Shear modulus | 71.2GPa2.63x stiffer in shear | 27.1GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 154GPa | 70.6GPa |
| Speed of sound | 4,839m/s | 5,193m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 16.2W/m·Ksourcebase material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), at 100 °C | 110W/m·Ksourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal (ISO 22007-2) |
| Thermal expansion | 15.7µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E22827% less | 20µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228 |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 78.6µm growth27% less | 100µm growth |
| Specific heat | 500J/kg·Ksourcebase material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), 0-100 °C | 963J/kg·Ksourcebase material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (MIL-HDBK-5J), at 100 °C |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 4.1mm²/s | 42.8mm²/s10.4x faster |
| Thermal shock resistance | 2,067W/m | 13,819W/m6.69x more resistant |
| Values for | EOS StainlessSteel 316L (powder 9011-0032), EOS M 290, ParameterSet 316L 20µm Surface M290/400W, as manufactured, horizontal; ISO 6892-1 | EOS Aluminium AlSi10Mg (powder 9011-0024), EOS M 290 | 30 µm process (AlSi10Mg_FlexM291 2.01), as manufactured, horizontal; machined (turned) specimens, ISO 6892-1 B10 |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel and DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum are 3D printed: their properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is DMLS 316L Stainless Steel stronger than DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is stronger: its yield strength is 530 MPa against 270 MPa for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum (1.96x).
Which is lighter, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is lighter: 2,670 kg/m³ against 7,900 kg/m³ for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel.
Which is stiffer, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is stiffer: Young's modulus 185 GPa against 72 GPa for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum, so the same part in DMLS 316L Stainless Steel deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum?
For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | DMLS 316L Stainless Steel | DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 15% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 1.85x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | 2.16x heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | 1.51x heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 1.89x heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 2.11x heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which is more ductile, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel stretches further before it breaks: 40% elongation at break against 10.2% for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum.
Which conducts heat better, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum conducts heat better: 110 W/m·K against 16.2 W/m·K for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel.
Which expands less with temperature?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel expands less: 15.7 µm/m·K against 20 µm/m·K for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1045
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel A992
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1018
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum 6061-T6
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum 2024-T351
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Concrete