Materials / Compare
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Plastic PPS GF40
Compare DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Plastic PPS GF40 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 530MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal | not given (tensile used) |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 640MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal | 195MPasourcetensile strength, 5 mm/min |
| Flexural strength | not sourced | 285MPasourceflexural strength at break |
| Elongation at break | 40%sourcetypical at break, as manufactured, horizontal | 1.9%sourcestrain at break, 5 mm/min |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 185GPasourcetypical, as built, horizontal (XY); EOSINT M280-400W / M290-400W, 316L_Surface 1.0, 20 µm (2014 sheet) | 14.7GPasourcetypical, 1 mm/min |
| Density | 7,900kg/m³sourcepart density (ISO 3369, not labelled min or typical), EOS M 290, 40 µm FlexLine | 1,650kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 67.1kN·m/kg | 118kN·m/kg1.76x higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 23.4MN·m/kg2.63x higher | 8.91MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.3sourcebase material: austenitic stainless steels incl. 1.4404 (316L), design value | 0.35sourceglass-reinforced Fortron PPS (class value, not grade-specific) |
| Shear modulus | 71.2GPa13.1x stiffer in shear | 5.44GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 154GPa | 16.3GPa |
| Speed of sound | 4,839m/s | 2,985m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 16.2W/m·Ksourcebase material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), at 100 °C | 0.2W/m·Ksource40% glass-reinforced Fortron, 25 °C (not grade-specific) |
| Thermal expansion | 15.7µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228 | 12µm/m·Ksourceparallel (flow), mean -50 to 90 °C |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 78.6µm growth | 60µm growth31% less |
| Specific heat | 500J/kg·Ksourcebase material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), 0-100 °C | not sourced |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 4.1mm²/s | not sourced |
| Thermal shock resistance | 2,067W/m14.4x more resistant | 144W/m |
| Melting point | not sourced | 280°CsourceDSC, 10 °C/min |
| Glass transition | not sourced | 90°CsourceDSC, 10 °C/min |
| Max service temperature | not sourced | 270°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa |
| Values for | EOS StainlessSteel 316L (powder 9011-0032), EOS M 290, ParameterSet 316L 20µm Surface M290/400W, as manufactured, horizontal; ISO 6892-1 | Celanese Fortron 1140L4 (PPS, 40% glass fibre), injection moulding; FORTRON PPS Short-Term Properties Guide (PPS-012, 2016); thermal conductivity and Poisson for 40% glass-reinforced Fortron from the Fortron PPS Design Manual (PPS-050, 2013). |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is DMLS 316L Stainless Steel stronger than Plastic PPS GF40?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is stronger: its yield strength is 530 MPa against tensile strength 195 MPa for Plastic PPS GF40 (2.72x).
Which is lighter, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Plastic PPS GF40?
Plastic PPS GF40 is lighter: 1,650 kg/m³ against 7,900 kg/m³ for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel.
Which is stiffer, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Plastic PPS GF40?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is stiffer: Young's modulus 185 GPa against 14.7 GPa for Plastic PPS GF40, so the same part in DMLS 316L Stainless Steel deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Plastic PPS GF40?
For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension); Plastic PPS GF40 is lighter for a stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | DMLS 316L Stainless Steel | Plastic PPS GF40 |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 2.63x heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 35% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | 2.06x heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | 1.76x heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 2.46x heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 2.9x heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or Plastic PPS GF40?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel conducts heat better: 16.2 W/m·K against 0.2 W/m·K for Plastic PPS GF40.
Which expands less with temperature?
Plastic PPS GF40 expands less: 12 µm/m·K against 15.7 µm/m·K for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel.
Among 72 materials
Related comparisons
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1045
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel A992
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1018
- Plastic PPS GF40 vs. Plastic PBT GF30
- Plastic PPS GF40 vs. Plastic LCP GF30
- Plastic PPS GF40 vs. Concrete
- Plastic PPS GF40 vs. PCB Laminate FR-4