Materials / Compare
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. SLS PA12 Nylon
Compare DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. SLS PA12 Nylon strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 530MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal | not given (tensile used) |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 640MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal | 48MPasourcetypical |
| Elongation at break | 40%sourcetypical at break, as manufactured, horizontal | 18%sourcetypical |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 185GPasourcetypical, as built, horizontal (XY); EOSINT M280-400W / M290-400W, 316L_Surface 1.0, 20 µm (2014 sheet) | 1.65GPasourcetypical |
| Density | 7,900kg/m³sourcepart density (ISO 3369, not labelled min or typical), EOS M 290, 40 µm FlexLine | 930kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 67.1kN·m/kg30% higher | 51.6kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 23.4MN·m/kg13.2x higher | 1.77MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.3sourcebase material: austenitic stainless steels incl. 1.4404 (316L), design value | not sourced |
| Shear modulus | 71.2GPa | not sourced |
| Bulk modulus | 154GPa | not sourced |
| Speed of sound | 4,839m/s | 1,332m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 16.2W/m·Ksourcebase material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), at 100 °C | not sourced |
| Thermal expansion | 15.7µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228 | not sourced |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 78.6µm growth | not sourced |
| Specific heat | 500J/kg·Ksourcebase material: wrought 316/316L (Cleveland-Cliffs), 0-100 °C | not sourced |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 4.1mm²/s | not sourced |
| Thermal shock resistance | 2,067W/m | not sourced |
| Melting point | not sourced | 176°Csourcetypical |
| Max service temperature | not sourced | 64°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa, X orientation |
| Values for | EOS StainlessSteel 316L (powder 9011-0032), EOS M 290, ParameterSet 316L 20µm Surface M290/400W, as manufactured, horizontal; ISO 6892-1 | EOS PA 2200 (PA12) Material Data Sheet, process parameter 'Balance' at 120 µm layer thickness, X orientation, dry (conditioned values not given). Live MDS status 04.10.2026, last changed 10.09.2026; PDF via ?topdf=... link on the same page. |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel and SLS PA12 Nylon are 3D printed: their properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is DMLS 316L Stainless Steel stronger than SLS PA12 Nylon?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is stronger: its yield strength is 530 MPa against tensile strength 48 MPa for SLS PA12 Nylon (11x).
Which is lighter, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or SLS PA12 Nylon?
SLS PA12 Nylon is lighter: 930 kg/m³ against 7,900 kg/m³ for DMLS 316L Stainless Steel.
Which is stiffer, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or SLS PA12 Nylon?
DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is stiffer: Young's modulus 185 GPa against 1.65 GPa for SLS PA12 Nylon, so the same part in DMLS 316L Stainless Steel deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS 316L Stainless Steel or SLS PA12 Nylon?
For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS 316L Stainless Steel is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie; SLS PA12 Nylon is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | DMLS 316L Stainless Steel | SLS PA12 Nylon |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 13.2x heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 25% heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | 1.76x heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 30% heavier |
| Strong beam | 1.71x heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 2.56x heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1045
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel A992
- DMLS 316L Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1018
- SLS PA12 Nylon vs. SLA Resin Tough 2000
- SLS PA12 Nylon vs. Plastic ABS
- SLS PA12 Nylon vs. Plastic PETG
- SLS PA12 Nylon vs. Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)