Materials / Compare
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Magnesium AZ91D
Compare DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Magnesium AZ91D strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 270MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal | 150MPasourcetypical, 0.2% tensile yield, ambient temperature |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 450MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal | 230MPasourcetypical, ambient temperature |
| Elongation at break | 10.2%sourcetypical at break, as manufactured, horizontal | 3%sourcetypical, ambient temperature |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 72GPasourcesame material and process, different machine maker: Renishaw RenAM 500, 30 µm, as built, horizontal (XY) | 45GPasourcetypical |
| Density | 2,670kg/m³sourcetypical part density (ISO 3369), EOS M 290, AlSi10Mg_030_FlexM291 (30 µm) | 1,810kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 101kN·m/kg22% higher | 82.9kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 27MN·m/kg8% higher | 24.9MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.33sourcebase material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (Al-9Si-0.6Mg, closest MIL-HDBK-5J alloy to AlSi10Mg / EN AC-43000) | 0.35sourcebase material: AZ91C casting (MIL-HDBK-5J handbook physical constant) |
| Shear modulus | 27.1GPa1.62x stiffer in shear | 16.7GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 70.6GPa | 50GPa |
| Speed of sound | 5,193m/s | 4,986m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 110W/m·Ksourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal (ISO 22007-2) | 72W/m·Ksourcetypical |
| Thermal expansion | 20µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228 | 25µm/m·Ksourcetypical, temperature range not stated |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 100µm growth25% less | 125µm growth |
| Specific heat | 963J/kg·Ksourcebase material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (MIL-HDBK-5J), at 100 °C | 1,050J/kg·Ksourcetypical |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 42.8mm²/s13% faster | 37.9mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 13,819W/m2.21x more resistant | 6,240W/m |
| Melting point | not sourced | 470–595°Csourcemelting range |
| Values for | EOS Aluminium AlSi10Mg (powder 9011-0024), EOS M 290 | 30 µm process (AlSi10Mg_FlexM291 2.01), as manufactured, horizontal; machined (turned) specimens, ISO 6892-1 B10 | ELEKTRON AZ91D magnesium die-casting alloy, as cast; Magnesium Elektron datasheet 475 (7/01), typical properties; Poisson from MIL-HDBK-5J for AZ91C castings. |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum stronger than Magnesium AZ91D?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is stronger: its yield strength is 270 MPa against 150 MPa for Magnesium AZ91D (1.8x).
Which is lighter, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Magnesium AZ91D?
Magnesium AZ91D is lighter: 1,810 kg/m³ against 2,670 kg/m³ for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum.
Which is stiffer, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Magnesium AZ91D?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is stiffer: Young's modulus 72 GPa against 45 GPa for Magnesium AZ91D, so the same part in DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Magnesium AZ91D?
For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), strong rod or tie; Magnesium AZ91D is lighter for a stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum | Magnesium AZ91D |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 8% heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 17% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | 26% heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 22% heavier |
| Strong beam | about equal | about equal |
| Strong panel or plate | 10% heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Magnesium AZ91D?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum conducts heat better: 110 W/m·K against 72 W/m·K for Magnesium AZ91D.
Which expands less with temperature?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum expands less: 20 µm/m·K against 25 µm/m·K for Magnesium AZ91D.
Among 72 materials
Related comparisons
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum 6061-T6
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum 2024-T351
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum 6063-T6
- Magnesium AZ91D vs. Magnesium AZ31B-H24
- Magnesium AZ91D vs. Concrete
- Magnesium AZ91D vs. Aluminum A380
- Magnesium AZ91D vs. Aluminum 5052-H32