Materials / Compare

FDM HIPS vs. Plastic PLA

Compare FDM HIPS vs. Plastic PLA strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
FDM HIPS3D printed (FDM)
Plastic PLA3D printed (FDM)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strengthnot given (tensile used)52.5MPasourcetypical
Ultimate tensile strength18.4MPasourcetypical52.5MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield)
Flexural strength31.8MPasourcetypical96.8MPasourcetypical3.04x stronger in bending
Elongation at break1.4%sourcetypical7.8%sourcetypical5.57x more ductile
Young's modulus (stiffness)1.59GPasourcetypical3.25GPasourcetypical2.05x stiffer
Density1,023kg/m³sourcetypical21% lighter1,240kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight18kN·m/kg42.3kN·m/kg2.35x higher
Stiffness to weight1.55MN·m/kg2.62MN·m/kg1.69x higher
Poisson's rationot sourcednot sourced
Shear modulusnot sourcednot sourced
Bulk modulusnot sourcednot sourced
Speed of sound1,246m/s1,619m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.17W/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution PS 486N injection-molding HIPS, typical0.13W/m·Ksourcebase material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °C
Thermal expansion80µm/m·Ksourcebase material: INEOS Styrolution PS 486N injection-molding HIPS, typicalnot sourced
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing400µm growthnot sourced
Specific heatnot sourced1,200J/kg·Ksourcebase material: NatureWorks Ingeo biopolymer, amorphous sheet, 25 °C
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)not sourced0.0874mm²/s
Thermal shock resistancenot sourcednot sourced
Melting pointnot sourced152°Csourcetypical
Glass transition99°Csourcetypical59.1°Csourcetypical
Max service temperature86°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa58.8°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens)
Values forBASF Forward AM (BASF 3D Printing Solutions) Ultrafuse HiPS, TDS v2.2 (13.11.2019), printed specimens, XY 'Flat'. Specimen print settings are not stated; recommended processing on the sheet: nozzle 240-260 °C, bed 100-120 °C, 40-80 mm/s. Product is discontinued (Forward AM product page) but the TDS is still served by Forward AM.Ultimaker PLA, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat) orientation; Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS dated April 20, 2022.

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

FDM HIPS and Plastic PLA are 3D printed: their properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.

Questions

Is FDM HIPS stronger than Plastic PLA?

Plastic PLA is stronger: its yield strength is 52.5 MPa against tensile strength 18.4 MPa for FDM HIPS (2.85x).

Which is lighter, FDM HIPS or Plastic PLA?

FDM HIPS is lighter: 1,023 kg/m³ against 1,240 kg/m³ for Plastic PLA.

Which is stiffer, FDM HIPS or Plastic PLA?

Plastic PLA is stiffer: Young's modulus 3.25 GPa against 1.59 GPa for FDM HIPS, so the same part in Plastic PLA deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, FDM HIPS or Plastic PLA?

For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic PLA is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.

Part that must beFDM HIPSPlastic PLA
Stiff rod or tie (tension)1.69x heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)18% heavierlighter
Stiff panel or plate5% heavierlighter
Strong rod or tie2.35x heavierlighter
Strong beam1.66x heavierlighter
Strong panel or plate39% heavierlighter

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which is more ductile, FDM HIPS or Plastic PLA?

Plastic PLA stretches further before it breaks: 7.8% elongation at break against 1.4% for FDM HIPS.

Which conducts heat better, FDM HIPS or Plastic PLA?

FDM HIPS conducts heat better: 0.17 W/m·K against 0.13 W/m·K for Plastic PLA.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelFDM HIPSPlastic PLA
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickFDM HIPSPlastic PLA
Strength against density

Related comparisons