Materials / Compare
Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Plastic Polycarbonate
Compare Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Plastic Polycarbonate strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 1,207MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. hot-rolled bar, 0.2% offset | 65MPasourcetypical, tensile yield |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 1,389MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar | 65MPasourcetypical, stress at break |
| Flexural strength | not sourced | 97MPasourcetypical, flexural strength |
| Elongation at break | 20%sourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar | 125%sourcetypical, strain at break |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 200GPasourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged | 2.4GPasourcetypical |
| Density | 8,221kg/m³sourcenominal, annealed and aged | 1,200kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 147kN·m/kg2.71x higher | 54.2kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 24.3MN·m/kg12.2x higher | 2MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.294sourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged | 0.38sourcetypical, polycarbonate family (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1) |
| Shear modulus | 77.3GPa88.9x stiffer in shear | 0.87GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 162GPa | 3.33GPa |
| Speed of sound | 4,932m/s | 1,414m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 11.4W/m·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged (calculated from resistivity per footnote a) | 0.2W/m·Ksourcetypical, through-plane, 23 C |
| Thermal expansion | 13.2µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 21-93 °C, annealed + aged | 65µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 23-55 C, parallel and normal |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 66µm growth4.92x less | 325µm growth |
| Specific heat | 435J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C | 1,172J/kg·Ksourcetypical (guide value), Bayer ASTM datasheet for Makrolon 2405, ASTM D 2766 |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 3.19mm²/s22.4x faster | 0.142mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 3,680W/m71.2x more resistant | 51.7W/m |
| Melting point | 1,260–1,336°Csourcemelting range | not sourced |
| Glass transition | not sourced | 144°Csourcetypical, DSC 10 C/min |
| Max service temperature | 704°Csourceupper use temperature stated by producer | 125°CsourceUL 746B RTI, tensile strength, 1.5 mm |
| Values for | INCONEL alloy 718, standard grade, 1750 °F/1 hr anneal + 1325 °F/8 hr F.C. to 1150 °F aged; Special Metals bulletin SMC-045 typical values | Covestro Makrolon 2405 general-purpose PC (MVR 19), Covestro technical datasheet version 2026-09-28, typical values |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Questions
Is Nickel Inconel 718 stronger than Plastic Polycarbonate?
Nickel Inconel 718 is stronger: its yield strength is 1,207 MPa against 65 MPa for Plastic Polycarbonate (18.6x).
Which is lighter, Nickel Inconel 718 or Plastic Polycarbonate?
Plastic Polycarbonate is lighter: 1,200 kg/m³ against 8,221 kg/m³ for Nickel Inconel 718.
Which is stiffer, Nickel Inconel 718 or Plastic Polycarbonate?
Nickel Inconel 718 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 2.4 GPa for Plastic Polycarbonate, so the same part in Nickel Inconel 718 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Nickel Inconel 718 or Plastic Polycarbonate?
For the same stiffness or strength: Nickel Inconel 718 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie, strong beam; Plastic Polycarbonate is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | Nickel Inconel 718 | Plastic Polycarbonate |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 12.2x heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 33% heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | 1.57x heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 2.71x heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 2% heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | 1.59x heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Nickel Inconel 718 or Plastic Polycarbonate?
Nickel Inconel 718 conducts heat better: 11.4 W/m·K against 0.2 W/m·K for Plastic Polycarbonate.
Which expands less with temperature?
Nickel Inconel 718 expands less: 13.2 µm/m·K against 65 µm/m·K for Plastic Polycarbonate.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Stainless 17-4PH
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel AISI 4340
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel AISI 1045
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Nylon
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. SLA Resin Standard
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. FDM Polycarbonate
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. Plastic POM/Acetal