Materials / Compare

Plastic UHMWPE vs. Solder SAC305

Compare Plastic UHMWPE vs. Solder SAC305 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Plastic UHMWPEBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Solder SAC305Cast
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength20MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield ISO 527, 50 mm/min22MPasourcetypical
Ultimate tensile strength43MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at break ISO 527, 50 mm/min39.6MPasourcetypical
Elongation at break465%sourcetypical, nominal elongation at break ISO 52749%sourcetypical
Young's modulus (stiffness)0.66GPasourcetypical, tensile modulus ISO 527, 1 mm/min6.9GPasourcetypical, temperature and strain rate not stated
Density930kg/m³sourcetypical7.9x lighter7,350kg/m³sourcetypical
Strength to weight21.5kN·m/kg7.18x higher2.99kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight0.71MN·m/kg0.939MN·m/kg32% higher
Poisson's rationot sourced0.35sourcetypical
Shear modulusnot sourced2.56GPa
Bulk modulusnot sourced7.67GPa
Speed of sound842m/s969m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.4W/m·Ksourcetypical, unfilled (narrative value, generic Celanese UHMWPE)61W/m·Ksourcetypical, temperature not stated
Thermal expansion200µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 to 100 °C (generic Celanese UHMWPE)21.9µm/m·Ksourcemean, 20-100 °C (MacDermid Alpha)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing1,000µm growth110µm growth9.13x less
Specific heatnot sourced232J/kg·Ksourcetypical (MacDermid Alpha)
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)not sourced35.8mm²/s
Thermal shock resistancenot sourced5,773W/m
Melting point130–138°CsourceDSC 10 K/min217–220°Csourcesolidus-liquidus
Max service temperature80°Csourcerecommended max constant operating temperaturenot sourced
Values forCelanese GUR 4120 (avg. molecular weight 4.7x10^6 g/mol), typical values on compression-molded specimens; CTE and thermal conductivity from Celanese's generic UHMWPE guide (grade not named)SAC305 (Sn96.5Ag3.0Cu0.5) solder alloy, bulk; Indium Corporation Indalloy 256 (SAC305) for Preforms product data sheet (Form No. 100346 R0, 2024), selected properties, test temperature not stated; expansion and specific heat from MacDermid Alpha VACULOY SAC TDS (06 September 2023).

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Plastic UHMWPE stronger than Solder SAC305?

Solder SAC305 is stronger: its yield strength is 22 MPa against 20 MPa for Plastic UHMWPE (10%).

Which is lighter, Plastic UHMWPE or Solder SAC305?

Plastic UHMWPE is lighter: 930 kg/m³ against 7,350 kg/m³ for Solder SAC305.

Which is stiffer, Plastic UHMWPE or Solder SAC305?

Solder SAC305 is stiffer: Young's modulus 6.9 GPa against 0.66 GPa for Plastic UHMWPE, so the same part in Solder SAC305 deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic UHMWPE or Solder SAC305?

For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic UHMWPE is lighter for a stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate; Solder SAC305 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension).

Part that must bePlastic UHMWPESolder SAC305
Stiff rod or tie (tension)32% heavierlighter
Stiff beam (bending)lighter2.44x heavier
Stiff panel or platelighter3.61x heavier
Strong rod or tielighter7.18x heavier
Strong beamlighter7.42x heavier
Strong panel or platelighter7.54x heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Plastic UHMWPE or Solder SAC305?

Solder SAC305 conducts heat better: 61 W/m·K against 0.4 W/m·K for Plastic UHMWPE.

Which expands less with temperature?

Solder SAC305 expands less: 21.9 µm/m·K against 200 µm/m·K for Plastic UHMWPE.

Among 72 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Ceramic Aluminum NitrideAluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DPlastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Plastic UHMWPESolder SAC305
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless Steel 304Stainless Steel 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless Steel 303Stainless Steel 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic PolycarbonatePlastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic HDPEPlastic PolypropylenePlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPCB Laminate FR-4SiliconCeramic Alumina 96%Aluminum A380Aluminum 6063-T6Aluminum 1100-OAluminum ADC12Magnesium AZ91DPlastic PBT GF30Plastic PPS GF40Plastic LCP GF30Plastic UHMWPESolder SAC305
Strength against density

Related comparisons