Materials / Compare

Plastic Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Polypropylene

Compare Plastic Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Polypropylene strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.

Change either side
Plastic PolycarbonateBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Plastic PolypropyleneBulk polymer (molded or machined)
Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browserOpen in LessCADOpen in LessCAD
Mechanical
Yield strength65MPasourcetypical, tensile yield33MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield ISO 527
Ultimate tensile strength65MPasourcetypical, stress at breaknot sourced
Flexural strength97MPasourcetypical, flexural strengthnot sourced
Elongation at break125%sourcetypical, strain at breaknot sourced
Young's modulus (stiffness)2.4GPasourcetypical1.45GPasourcetypical, tensile modulus ISO 527
Density1,200kg/m³sourcetypical900kg/m³sourcetypical, 23 °C ISO 1183-1
Strength to weight54.2kN·m/kg48% higher36.7kN·m/kg
Stiffness to weight2MN·m/kg24% higher1.61MN·m/kg
Poisson's ratio0.38sourcetypical, polycarbonate family (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1)0.42sourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene)
Shear modulus0.87GPa1.7x stiffer in shear0.511GPa
Bulk modulus3.33GPa3.02GPa
Speed of sound1,414m/s1,269m/s
Thermal
Thermal conductivity0.2W/m·Ksourcetypical, through-plane, 23 C0.17–0.22W/m·Ksourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene)
Thermal expansion65µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 23-55 C, parallel and normal80–100µm/m·Ksourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene)
100 mm part over a 50 °C swing325µm growth38% less450µm growth
Specific heat1,172J/kg·Ksourcetypical (guide value), Bayer ASTM datasheet for Makrolon 2405, ASTM D 2766not sourced
Heats up and cools (diffusivity)0.142mm²/snot sourced
Thermal shock resistance51.7W/m1.81x more resistant28.6W/m
Glass transition144°Csourcetypical, DSC 10 C/minnot sourced
Max service temperature125°CsourceUL 746B RTI, tensile strength, 1.5 mm90°CsourceHDT 0.45 MPa (ISO 75B), unannealed
Values forCovestro Makrolon 2405 general-purpose PC (MVR 19), Covestro technical datasheet version 2026-09-28, typical valuesLyondellBasell Moplen HP501H polypropylene homopolymer (general purpose), typical ISO values

Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.

Questions

Is Plastic Polycarbonate stronger than Plastic Polypropylene?

Plastic Polycarbonate is stronger: its yield strength is 65 MPa against 33 MPa for Plastic Polypropylene (1.97x).

Which is lighter, Plastic Polycarbonate or Plastic Polypropylene?

Plastic Polypropylene is lighter: 900 kg/m³ against 1,200 kg/m³ for Plastic Polycarbonate.

Which is stiffer, Plastic Polycarbonate or Plastic Polypropylene?

Plastic Polycarbonate is stiffer: Young's modulus 2.4 GPa against 1.45 GPa for Plastic Polypropylene, so the same part in Plastic Polycarbonate deflects less under the same load.

Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic Polycarbonate or Plastic Polypropylene?

For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic Polycarbonate is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate; Plastic Polypropylene is lighter for a stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate.

Part that must bePlastic PolycarbonatePlastic Polypropylene
Stiff rod or tie (tension)lighter24% heavier
Stiff beam (bending)4% heavierlighter
Stiff panel or plate13% heavierlighter
Strong rod or tielighter48% heavier
Strong beamlighter18% heavier
Strong panel or platelighter5% heavier

For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).

Which conducts heat better, Plastic Polycarbonate or Plastic Polypropylene?

Plastic Polycarbonate conducts heat better: 0.2 W/m·K against 0.195 W/m·K for Plastic Polypropylene.

Which expands less with temperature?

Plastic Polycarbonate expands less: 65 µm/m·K against 90 µm/m·K for Plastic Polypropylene.

Among 59 materials

1k10k0.1110100Density (kg/m³)Young's modulus (GPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelPlastic PolycarbonatePlastic Polypropylene
Stiffness against density
1k10k101001kDensity (kg/m³)Yield strength (MPa)Plastic PLAPlastic PETGPlastic ABSPlastic TPUPlastic NylonRubberAluminumSteelIronTitaniumSteel AISI 1018Stainless 304Stainless 316Aluminum 6061-T6Aluminum 7075-T6Brass C360Copper C110GlassSteel AISI 1045Steel AISI 4340Steel A992Stainless 303Stainless 17-4PHAluminum 2024-T351Aluminum 5052-H32Aluminum 7050-T7451Titanium Ti-6Al-4VBrass C260Nickel Inconel 718Magnesium AZ31B-H24Zinc Zamak 3Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)Plastic POM/AcetalPlastic Nylon PA6Plastic Nylon PA66Plastic PEEKPlastic PTFEPlastic UHMWPEPlastic HDPEPlastic PMMAFDM ASAFDM PolycarbonateFDM PAHT-CFFDM HIPSSLA Resin Tough 2000SLA Resin Elastic 50ASLS PA12 NylonDMLS AlSi10Mg AluminumDMLS Ti-6Al-4V ELI TitaniumDMLS 316L Stainless SteelDMLS 17-4PH Stainless SteelBrickPlastic PolycarbonatePlastic Polypropylene
Strength against density

Related comparisons