Materials / Compare
Plastic Polycarbonate vs. Steel AISI 4340
Compare Plastic Polycarbonate vs. Steel AISI 4340 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 65MPasourcetypical, tensile yield | 1,035MPasourcetypical, transverse |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 65MPasourcetypical, stress at break | 1,140MPasourcetypical, transverse |
| Flexural strength | 97MPasourcetypical, flexural strength | not sourced |
| Elongation at break | 125%sourcetypical, strain at break | 18%sourcetypical, transverse |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 2.4GPasourcetypical | 200GPasourceMIL-HDBK-5J design value (AISI 4340, quenched and tempered) |
| Density | 1,200kg/m³sourcetypical6.53x lighter | 7,840kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 54.2kN·m/kg | 132kN·m/kg2.44x higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 2MN·m/kg | 25.5MN·m/kg12.7x higher |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.38sourcetypical, polycarbonate family (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1) | 0.32sourceMIL-HDBK-5J design value (AISI 4340, quenched and tempered) |
| Shear modulus | 0.87GPa | 75.7GPa87.1x stiffer in shear |
| Bulk modulus | 3.33GPa | 185GPa |
| Speed of sound | 1,414m/s | 5,049m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 0.2W/m·Ksourcetypical, through-plane, 23 C | 37.5W/m·Ksourcetypical |
| Thermal expansion | 65µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 23-55 C, parallel and normal | 11.3µm/m·Ksourcemean, -18 to 93 °C |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 325µm growth | 56.5µm growth5.75x less |
| Specific heat | 1,172J/kg·Ksourcetypical (guide value), Bayer ASTM datasheet for Makrolon 2405, ASTM D 2766 | 448J/kg·Ksourcetypical |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 0.142mm²/s | 10.7mm²/s75x faster |
| Thermal shock resistance | 51.7W/m | 11,678W/m226x more resistant |
| Glass transition | 144°Csourcetypical, DSC 10 C/min | not sourced |
| Max service temperature | 125°CsourceUL 746B RTI, tensile strength, 1.5 mm | not sourced |
| Values for | Covestro Makrolon 2405 general-purpose PC (MVR 19), Covestro technical datasheet version 2026-09-28, typical values | Carpenter (Latrobe) Lescalloy 4340 VAC-ARC datasheet; mechanical row for 1100 °F temper; physical properties grade-level |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Questions
Is Plastic Polycarbonate stronger than Steel AISI 4340?
Steel AISI 4340 is stronger: its yield strength is 1,035 MPa against 65 MPa for Plastic Polycarbonate (15.9x).
Which is lighter, Plastic Polycarbonate or Steel AISI 4340?
Plastic Polycarbonate is lighter: 1,200 kg/m³ against 7,840 kg/m³ for Steel AISI 4340.
Which is stiffer, Plastic Polycarbonate or Steel AISI 4340?
Steel AISI 4340 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 2.4 GPa for Plastic Polycarbonate, so the same part in Steel AISI 4340 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic Polycarbonate or Steel AISI 4340?
For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic Polycarbonate is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong beam, strong panel or plate; Steel AISI 4340 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie.
| Part that must be | Plastic Polycarbonate | Steel AISI 4340 |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 12.7x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 40% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 50% heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | 2.44x heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | lighter | 3% heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 1.64x heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Plastic Polycarbonate or Steel AISI 4340?
Steel AISI 4340 conducts heat better: 37.5 W/m·K against 0.2 W/m·K for Plastic Polycarbonate.
Which expands less with temperature?
Steel AISI 4340 expands less: 11.3 µm/m·K against 65 µm/m·K for Plastic Polycarbonate.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Nylon
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. SLA Resin Standard
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. FDM Polycarbonate
- Plastic Polycarbonate vs. Plastic POM/Acetal
- Steel AISI 4340 vs. Nickel Inconel 718
- Steel AISI 4340 vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Steel AISI 4340 vs. Stainless 17-4PH
- Steel AISI 4340 vs. Steel AISI 1045