Materials / Compare
Plastic Polypropylene vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
Compare Plastic Polypropylene vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 33MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield ISO 527 | 861MPasourcemean, as built, horizontal (N=72) |
| Ultimate tensile strength | not sourced | 886MPasourcemean, as built, horizontal (N=72) |
| Elongation at break | not sourced | 19.9%sourcemean at break, as built, horizontal |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 1.45GPasourcetypical, tensile modulus ISO 527 | 197GPasourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900 (Cleveland-Cliffs) |
| Density | 900kg/m³sourcetypical, 23 °C ISO 1183-1 | 7,790kg/m³sourcemean part density (ISO 3369) |
| Strength to weight | 36.7kN·m/kg | 110kN·m/kg3.01x higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 1.61MN·m/kg | 25.3MN·m/kg15.7x higher |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.42sourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene) | 0.272sourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, all conditions (Cleveland-Cliffs) |
| Shear modulus | 0.511GPa | 77.4GPa152x stiffer in shear |
| Bulk modulus | 3.02GPa | 144GPa |
| Speed of sound | 1,269m/s | 5,029m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 0.17–0.22W/m·Ksourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene) | 17.9W/m·Ksourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900, at 149 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs) |
| Thermal expansion | 80–100µm/m·Ksourcebase material: polypropylene homopolymer family (INEOS Olefins & Polymers USA, Typical Engineering Properties of Polypropylene) | 10.4µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228, AFTER atmospheric heat treatment (as-built value not published) |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 450µm growth | 52µm growth8.65x less |
| Specific heat | not sourced | 460J/kg·Ksourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition A, 0-100 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs) |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | not sourced | 5mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 28.6W/m | 5,474W/m191x more resistant |
| Max service temperature | 90°CsourceHDT 0.45 MPa (ISO 75B), unannealed | not sourced |
| Values for | LyondellBasell Moplen HP501H polypropylene homopolymer (general purpose), typical ISO values | EOS StainlessSteel 17-4PH IndustryLine (powder 9011-0041), EOS M 290, 40 µm, default job 17-4PH_040_StainlessM291_100, as built, horizontal; ISO 6892 & ASTM E8M |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is Plastic Polypropylene stronger than DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is stronger: its yield strength is 861 MPa against 33 MPa for Plastic Polypropylene (26.1x).
Which is lighter, Plastic Polypropylene or DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel?
Plastic Polypropylene is lighter: 900 kg/m³ against 7,790 kg/m³ for DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel.
Which is stiffer, Plastic Polypropylene or DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is stiffer: Young's modulus 197 GPa against 1.45 GPa for Plastic Polypropylene, so the same part in DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Plastic Polypropylene or DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel?
For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic Polypropylene is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong panel or plate; DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie, strong beam.
| Part that must be | Plastic Polypropylene | DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 15.7x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 35% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 1.68x heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | 3.01x heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 2% heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 1.69x heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Plastic Polypropylene or DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel conducts heat better: 17.9 W/m·K against 0.195 W/m·K for Plastic Polypropylene.
Which expands less with temperature?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel expands less: 10.4 µm/m·K against 90 µm/m·K for Plastic Polypropylene.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- Plastic Polypropylene vs. SLA Resin Tough 2000
- Plastic Polypropylene vs. Plastic ABS
- Plastic Polypropylene vs. SLS PA12 Nylon
- Plastic Polypropylene vs. Rubber
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 4340
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Nickel Inconel 718
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Stainless 17-4PH
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1045