Materials / Compare
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Plastic UHMWPE
Compare DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Plastic UHMWPE strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 861MPasourcemean, as built, horizontal (N=72) | 20MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at yield ISO 527, 50 mm/min |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 886MPasourcemean, as built, horizontal (N=72) | 43MPasourcetypical, tensile stress at break ISO 527, 50 mm/min |
| Elongation at break | 19.9%sourcemean at break, as built, horizontal | 465%sourcetypical, nominal elongation at break ISO 527 |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 197GPasourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900 (Cleveland-Cliffs) | 0.66GPasourcetypical, tensile modulus ISO 527, 1 mm/min |
| Density | 7,790kg/m³sourcemean part density (ISO 3369) | 930kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 110kN·m/kg5.14x higher | 21.5kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 25.3MN·m/kg35.6x higher | 0.71MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.272sourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, all conditions (Cleveland-Cliffs) | not sourced |
| Shear modulus | 77.4GPa | not sourced |
| Bulk modulus | 144GPa | not sourced |
| Speed of sound | 5,029m/s | 842m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 17.9W/m·Ksourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition H 900, at 149 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs) | 0.4W/m·Ksourcetypical, unfilled (narrative value, generic Celanese UHMWPE) |
| Thermal expansion | 10.4µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228, AFTER atmospheric heat treatment (as-built value not published) | 200µm/m·Ksourcetypical, 20 to 100 °C (generic Celanese UHMWPE) |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 52µm growth19.2x less | 1,000µm growth |
| Specific heat | 460J/kg·Ksourcebase material: wrought 17-4 PH, Condition A, 0-100 °C (Cleveland-Cliffs) | not sourced |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 5mm²/s | not sourced |
| Thermal shock resistance | 5,474W/m | not sourced |
| Melting point | not sourced | 130–138°CsourceDSC 10 K/min |
| Max service temperature | not sourced | 80°Csourcerecommended max constant operating temperature |
| Values for | EOS StainlessSteel 17-4PH IndustryLine (powder 9011-0041), EOS M 290, 40 µm, default job 17-4PH_040_StainlessM291_100, as built, horizontal; ISO 6892 & ASTM E8M | Celanese GUR 4120 (avg. molecular weight 4.7x10^6 g/mol), typical values on compression-molded specimens; CTE and thermal conductivity from Celanese's generic UHMWPE guide (grade not named) |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel stronger than Plastic UHMWPE?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is stronger: its yield strength is 861 MPa against 20 MPa for Plastic UHMWPE (43x).
Which is lighter, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Plastic UHMWPE?
Plastic UHMWPE is lighter: 930 kg/m³ against 7,790 kg/m³ for DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel.
Which is stiffer, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Plastic UHMWPE?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is stiffer: Young's modulus 197 GPa against 0.66 GPa for Plastic UHMWPE, so the same part in DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Plastic UHMWPE?
For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie, strong beam; Plastic UHMWPE is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel | Plastic UHMWPE |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 35.6x heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 2.06x heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | 25% heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 5.14x heavier |
| Strong beam | lighter | 47% heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | 28% heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel or Plastic UHMWPE?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel conducts heat better: 17.9 W/m·K against 0.4 W/m·K for Plastic UHMWPE.
Which expands less with temperature?
DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel expands less: 10.4 µm/m·K against 200 µm/m·K for Plastic UHMWPE.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 4340
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Nickel Inconel 718
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Stainless 17-4PH
- DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel vs. Steel AISI 1045
- Plastic UHMWPE vs. Rubber
- Plastic UHMWPE vs. Plastic HDPE
- Plastic UHMWPE vs. FDM HIPS
- Plastic UHMWPE vs. Plastic Polypropylene