Materials / Compare
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Plastic PPS GF40
Compare DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Plastic PPS GF40 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 270MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal | not given (tensile used) |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 450MPasourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal | 195MPasourcetensile strength, 5 mm/min |
| Flexural strength | not sourced | 285MPasourceflexural strength at break |
| Elongation at break | 10.2%sourcetypical at break, as manufactured, horizontal | 1.9%sourcestrain at break, 5 mm/min |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 72GPasourcesame material and process, different machine maker: Renishaw RenAM 500, 30 µm, as built, horizontal (XY) | 14.7GPasourcetypical, 1 mm/min |
| Density | 2,670kg/m³sourcetypical part density (ISO 3369), EOS M 290, AlSi10Mg_030_FlexM291 (30 µm) | 1,650kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 101kN·m/kg | 118kN·m/kg17% higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 27MN·m/kg3.03x higher | 8.91MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.33sourcebase material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (Al-9Si-0.6Mg, closest MIL-HDBK-5J alloy to AlSi10Mg / EN AC-43000) | 0.35sourceglass-reinforced Fortron PPS (class value, not grade-specific) |
| Shear modulus | 27.1GPa4.97x stiffer in shear | 5.44GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 70.6GPa | 16.3GPa |
| Speed of sound | 5,193m/s | 2,985m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 110W/m·Ksourcetypical, as manufactured, horizontal (ISO 22007-2) | 0.2W/m·Ksource40% glass-reinforced Fortron, 25 °C (not grade-specific) |
| Thermal expansion | 20µm/m·Ksourcemean 25-100 °C, ASTM E228 | 12µm/m·Ksourceparallel (flow), mean -50 to 90 °C |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 100µm growth | 60µm growth1.67x less |
| Specific heat | 963J/kg·Ksourcebase material: cast Al-Si-Mg alloy 359.0 (MIL-HDBK-5J), at 100 °C | not sourced |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 42.8mm²/s | not sourced |
| Thermal shock resistance | 13,819W/m96.2x more resistant | 144W/m |
| Melting point | not sourced | 280°CsourceDSC, 10 °C/min |
| Glass transition | not sourced | 90°CsourceDSC, 10 °C/min |
| Max service temperature | not sourced | 270°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa |
| Values for | EOS Aluminium AlSi10Mg (powder 9011-0024), EOS M 290 | 30 µm process (AlSi10Mg_FlexM291 2.01), as manufactured, horizontal; machined (turned) specimens, ISO 6892-1 B10 | Celanese Fortron 1140L4 (PPS, 40% glass fibre), injection moulding; FORTRON PPS Short-Term Properties Guide (PPS-012, 2016); thermal conductivity and Poisson for 40% glass-reinforced Fortron from the Fortron PPS Design Manual (PPS-050, 2013). |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum stronger than Plastic PPS GF40?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is stronger: its yield strength is 270 MPa against tensile strength 195 MPa for Plastic PPS GF40 (38%).
Which is lighter, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Plastic PPS GF40?
Plastic PPS GF40 is lighter: 1,650 kg/m³ against 2,670 kg/m³ for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum.
Which is stiffer, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Plastic PPS GF40?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is stiffer: Young's modulus 72 GPa against 14.7 GPa for Plastic PPS GF40, so the same part in DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Plastic PPS GF40?
For the same stiffness or strength: DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate; Plastic PPS GF40 is lighter for a strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum | Plastic PPS GF40 |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 3.03x heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 37% heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 5% heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | 17% heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 30% heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 38% heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum or Plastic PPS GF40?
DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum conducts heat better: 110 W/m·K against 0.2 W/m·K for Plastic PPS GF40.
Which expands less with temperature?
Plastic PPS GF40 expands less: 12 µm/m·K against 20 µm/m·K for DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum.
Among 72 materials
Related comparisons
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum 6061-T6
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum 2024-T351
- DMLS AlSi10Mg Aluminum vs. Aluminum 6063-T6
- Plastic PPS GF40 vs. Plastic PBT GF30
- Plastic PPS GF40 vs. Plastic LCP GF30
- Plastic PPS GF40 vs. Concrete
- Plastic PPS GF40 vs. PCB Laminate FR-4