Materials / Compare
FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic PPS GF40
Compare FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic PPS GF40 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 53.3MPasourcetypical | not given (tensile used) |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 53.3MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield) | 195MPasourcetensile strength, 5 mm/min |
| Flexural strength | 89.4MPasourcetypical | 285MPasourceflexural strength at break |
| Elongation at break | 9.2%sourcetypical | 1.9%sourcestrain at break, 5 mm/min |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 2.39GPasourcetypical | 14.7GPasourcetypical, 1 mm/min |
| Density | 1,180–1,200kg/m³sourcerange | 1,650kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 44.8kN·m/kg | 118kN·m/kg2.64x higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 2.01MN·m/kg | 8.91MN·m/kg4.43x higher |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.38sourcebase material: polycarbonate family typical (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1) | 0.35sourceglass-reinforced Fortron PPS (class value, not grade-specific) |
| Shear modulus | 0.867GPa | 5.44GPa6.28x stiffer in shear |
| Bulk modulus | 3.33GPa | 16.3GPa |
| Speed of sound | 1,418m/s | 2,985m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 0.2W/m·Ksourcebase material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, through-plane, 23 °C | 0.2W/m·Ksource40% glass-reinforced Fortron, 25 °C (not grade-specific) |
| Thermal expansion | 65µm/m·Ksourcebase material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, 23-55 °C, parallel | 12µm/m·Ksourceparallel (flow), mean -50 to 90 °C |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 325µm growth | 60µm growth5.42x less |
| Specific heat | not sourced | not sourced |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | not sourced | not sourced |
| Thermal shock resistance | 42.5W/m | 144W/m3.38x more resistant |
| Melting point | not sourced | 280°CsourceDSC, 10 °C/min |
| Glass transition | 108°Csourcetypical | 90°CsourceDSC, 10 °C/min |
| Max service temperature | 105°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens) | 270°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa |
| Values for | Ultimaker PC, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat); Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS (file v5.00), April 20, 2022. | Celanese Fortron 1140L4 (PPS, 40% glass fibre), injection moulding; FORTRON PPS Short-Term Properties Guide (PPS-012, 2016); thermal conductivity and Poisson for 40% glass-reinforced Fortron from the Fortron PPS Design Manual (PPS-050, 2013). |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
FDM Polycarbonate is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is FDM Polycarbonate stronger than Plastic PPS GF40?
Plastic PPS GF40 is stronger: its tensile strength is 195 MPa against yield strength 53.3 MPa for FDM Polycarbonate (3.66x).
Which is lighter, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PPS GF40?
FDM Polycarbonate is lighter: 1,190 kg/m³ against 1,650 kg/m³ for Plastic PPS GF40.
Which is stiffer, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PPS GF40?
Plastic PPS GF40 is stiffer: Young's modulus 14.7 GPa against 2.39 GPa for FDM Polycarbonate, so the same part in Plastic PPS GF40 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PPS GF40?
For the same stiffness or strength: Plastic PPS GF40 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong rod or tie, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | FDM Polycarbonate | Plastic PPS GF40 |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 4.43x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 1.79x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | 32% heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | 2.64x heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 1.71x heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 38% heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, FDM Polycarbonate or Plastic PPS GF40?
FDM Polycarbonate conducts heat better: 0.2 W/m·K against 0.2 W/m·K for Plastic PPS GF40.
Which expands less with temperature?
Plastic PPS GF40 expands less: 12 µm/m·K against 65 µm/m·K for FDM Polycarbonate.
Among 72 materials
Related comparisons
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Nylon
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Polycarbonate
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. SLA Resin Standard
- Plastic PPS GF40 vs. Plastic PBT GF30
- Plastic PPS GF40 vs. Plastic LCP GF30
- Plastic PPS GF40 vs. Concrete
- Plastic PPS GF40 vs. PCB Laminate FR-4