Materials / Compare
Magnesium AZ31B-H24 vs. Nickel Inconel 718
Compare Magnesium AZ31B-H24 vs. Nickel Inconel 718 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 220MPasourcetypical, H24, 0.5-6 mm, 0.2 % proof stress | 1,207MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. hot-rolled bar, 0.2% offset |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 290MPasourcetypical, H24, 0.5-6 mm | 1,389MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar |
| Elongation at break | 13%sourcetypical, H24, 0.5-6 mm, gauge 5.65√A | 20%sourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 44.8GPasourcetypical (handbook physical constant) | 200GPasourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged |
| Density | 1,769kg/m³sourcenominal | 8,221kg/m³sourcenominal, annealed and aged |
| Strength to weight | 124kN·m/kg | 147kN·m/kg18% higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 25.3MN·m/kg4% higher | 24.3MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.35sourcetypical (handbook physical constant) | 0.294sourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged |
| Shear modulus | 16.6GPa | 77.3GPa4.66x stiffer in shear |
| Bulk modulus | 49.8GPa | 162GPa |
| Speed of sound | 5,032m/s | 4,932m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 76.9W/m·Ksourcetypical (temper/temperature not stated) | 11.4W/m·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged (calculated from resistivity per footnote a) |
| Thermal expansion | 26.8µm/m·Ksourcetypical (temperature range not stated) | 13.2µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 21-93 °C, annealed + aged |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 134µm growth | 66µm growth2.03x less |
| Specific heat | 1,040J/kg·Ksourcetypical | 435J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 41.8mm²/s13.1x faster | 3.19mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 9,159W/m2.49x more resistant | 3,680W/m |
| Melting point | not sourced | 1,260–1,336°Csourcemelting range |
| Max service temperature | 149°Csourcestated application limit | 704°Csourceupper use temperature stated by producer |
| Values for | AZ31B-H24 sheet 0.016-0.062 in., MIL-HDBK-5J Table 4.2.1.0(b) (AMS 4377); strengths are S-basis MINIMUMS | INCONEL alloy 718, standard grade, 1750 °F/1 hr anneal + 1325 °F/8 hr F.C. to 1150 °F aged; Special Metals bulletin SMC-045 typical values |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Questions
Is Magnesium AZ31B-H24 stronger than Nickel Inconel 718?
Nickel Inconel 718 is stronger: its yield strength is 1,207 MPa against 220 MPa for Magnesium AZ31B-H24 (5.49x).
Which is lighter, Magnesium AZ31B-H24 or Nickel Inconel 718?
Magnesium AZ31B-H24 is lighter: 1,769 kg/m³ against 8,221 kg/m³ for Nickel Inconel 718.
Which is stiffer, Magnesium AZ31B-H24 or Nickel Inconel 718?
Nickel Inconel 718 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 44.8 GPa for Magnesium AZ31B-H24, so the same part in Nickel Inconel 718 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Magnesium AZ31B-H24 or Nickel Inconel 718?
For the same stiffness or strength: Magnesium AZ31B-H24 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong beam, strong panel or plate; Nickel Inconel 718 is lighter for a strong rod or tie.
| Part that must be | Magnesium AZ31B-H24 | Nickel Inconel 718 |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 4% heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 2.2x heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 2.82x heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | 18% heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | lighter | 49% heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 1.98x heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Magnesium AZ31B-H24 or Nickel Inconel 718?
Magnesium AZ31B-H24 conducts heat better: 76.9 W/m·K against 11.4 W/m·K for Nickel Inconel 718.
Which expands less with temperature?
Nickel Inconel 718 expands less: 13.2 µm/m·K against 26.8 µm/m·K for Magnesium AZ31B-H24.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- Magnesium AZ31B-H24 vs. Concrete
- Magnesium AZ31B-H24 vs. Aluminum 5052-H32
- Magnesium AZ31B-H24 vs. Aluminum
- Magnesium AZ31B-H24 vs. Aluminum 6061-T6
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Stainless Steel 17-4PH
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel AISI 4340
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel AISI 1045