Materials / Compare
Magnesium AZ91D vs. Nickel Inconel 718
Compare Magnesium AZ91D vs. Nickel Inconel 718 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 150MPasourcetypical, 0.2% tensile yield, ambient temperature | 1,207MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. hot-rolled bar, 0.2% offset |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 230MPasourcetypical, ambient temperature | 1,389MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar |
| Elongation at break | 3%sourcetypical, ambient temperature | 20%sourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 45GPasourcetypical | 200GPasourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged |
| Density | 1,810kg/m³sourcetypical | 8,221kg/m³sourcenominal, annealed and aged |
| Strength to weight | 82.9kN·m/kg | 147kN·m/kg1.77x higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 24.9MN·m/kg2% higher | 24.3MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.35sourcebase material: AZ91C casting (MIL-HDBK-5J handbook physical constant) | 0.294sourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged |
| Shear modulus | 16.7GPa | 77.3GPa4.64x stiffer in shear |
| Bulk modulus | 50GPa | 162GPa |
| Speed of sound | 4,986m/s | 4,932m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 72W/m·Ksourcetypical | 11.4W/m·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged (calculated from resistivity per footnote a) |
| Thermal expansion | 25µm/m·Ksourcetypical, temperature range not stated | 13.2µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 21-93 °C, annealed + aged |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 125µm growth | 66µm growth1.89x less |
| Specific heat | 1,050J/kg·Ksourcetypical | 435J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 37.9mm²/s11.9x faster | 3.19mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 6,240W/m1.7x more resistant | 3,680W/m |
| Melting point | 470–595°Csourcemelting range | 1,260–1,336°Csourcemelting range |
| Max service temperature | not sourced | 704°Csourceupper use temperature stated by producer |
| Values for | ELEKTRON AZ91D magnesium die-casting alloy, as cast; Magnesium Elektron datasheet 475 (7/01), typical properties; Poisson from MIL-HDBK-5J for AZ91C castings. | INCONEL alloy 718, standard grade, 1750 °F/1 hr anneal + 1325 °F/8 hr F.C. to 1150 °F aged; Special Metals bulletin SMC-045 typical values |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Questions
Is Magnesium AZ91D stronger than Nickel Inconel 718?
Nickel Inconel 718 is stronger: its yield strength is 1,207 MPa against 150 MPa for Magnesium AZ91D (8.05x).
Which is lighter, Magnesium AZ91D or Nickel Inconel 718?
Magnesium AZ91D is lighter: 1,810 kg/m³ against 8,221 kg/m³ for Nickel Inconel 718.
Which is stiffer, Magnesium AZ91D or Nickel Inconel 718?
Nickel Inconel 718 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 45 GPa for Magnesium AZ91D, so the same part in Nickel Inconel 718 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Magnesium AZ91D or Nickel Inconel 718?
For the same stiffness or strength: Magnesium AZ91D is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong beam, strong panel or plate; Nickel Inconel 718 is lighter for a strong rod or tie.
| Part that must be | Magnesium AZ91D | Nickel Inconel 718 |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 2% heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | lighter | 2.15x heavier |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 2.76x heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | 1.77x heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | lighter | 13% heavier |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 1.6x heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Magnesium AZ91D or Nickel Inconel 718?
Magnesium AZ91D conducts heat better: 72 W/m·K against 11.4 W/m·K for Nickel Inconel 718.
Which expands less with temperature?
Nickel Inconel 718 expands less: 13.2 µm/m·K against 25 µm/m·K for Magnesium AZ91D.
Among 72 materials
Related comparisons
- Magnesium AZ91D vs. Magnesium AZ31B-H24
- Magnesium AZ91D vs. Concrete
- Magnesium AZ91D vs. Aluminum A380
- Magnesium AZ91D vs. Aluminum 5052-H32
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Stainless Steel 17-4PH
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel AISI 4340
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel AISI 1045