Materials / Compare
FDM Polycarbonate vs. Nickel Inconel 718
Compare FDM Polycarbonate vs. Nickel Inconel 718 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 53.3MPasourcetypical | 1,207MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. hot-rolled bar, 0.2% offset |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 53.3MPasourcetypical, peak stress (= stress at yield) | 1,389MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar |
| Flexural strength | 89.4MPasourcetypical | not sourced |
| Elongation at break | 9.2%sourcetypical | 20%sourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 2.39GPasourcetypical | 200GPasourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged |
| Density | 1,180–1,200kg/m³sourcerange | 8,221kg/m³sourcenominal, annealed and aged |
| Strength to weight | 44.8kN·m/kg | 147kN·m/kg3.28x higher |
| Stiffness to weight | 2.01MN·m/kg | 24.3MN·m/kg12.1x higher |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.38sourcebase material: polycarbonate family typical (Covestro Part and Mold Design guide, Table 3-1) | 0.294sourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged |
| Shear modulus | 0.867GPa | 77.3GPa89.1x stiffer in shear |
| Bulk modulus | 3.33GPa | 162GPa |
| Speed of sound | 1,418m/s | 4,932m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 0.2W/m·Ksourcebase material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, through-plane, 23 °C | 11.4W/m·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged (calculated from resistivity per footnote a) |
| Thermal expansion | 65µm/m·Ksourcebase material: Covestro Makrolon 2405 injection-molding PC, typical, 23-55 °C, parallel | 13.2µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 21-93 °C, annealed + aged |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 325µm growth | 66µm growth4.92x less |
| Specific heat | not sourced | 435J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | not sourced | 3.19mm²/s |
| Thermal shock resistance | 42.5W/m | 3,680W/m86.6x more resistant |
| Melting point | not sourced | 1,260–1,336°Csourcemelting range |
| Glass transition | 108°Csourcetypical | not sourced |
| Max service temperature | 105°CsourceHDT 0.455 MPa (printed specimens) | 704°Csourceupper use temperature stated by producer |
| Values for | Ultimaker PC, 3D-printed specimens, XY (flat); Ultimaker S5 Pro, engineering intent profile, 0.15 mm layer height, AA 0.4 print core, 100% infill, Cura 4.9, printed one-at-a-time, conditioned >=24 h at room temperature. TDS (file v5.00), April 20, 2022. | INCONEL alloy 718, standard grade, 1750 °F/1 hr anneal + 1325 °F/8 hr F.C. to 1150 °F aged; Special Metals bulletin SMC-045 typical values |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
FDM Polycarbonate is 3D printed: its properties depend on build direction and print settings; these are typical values.
Questions
Is FDM Polycarbonate stronger than Nickel Inconel 718?
Nickel Inconel 718 is stronger: its yield strength is 1,207 MPa against 53.3 MPa for FDM Polycarbonate (22.6x).
Which is lighter, FDM Polycarbonate or Nickel Inconel 718?
FDM Polycarbonate is lighter: 1,190 kg/m³ against 8,221 kg/m³ for Nickel Inconel 718.
Which is stiffer, FDM Polycarbonate or Nickel Inconel 718?
Nickel Inconel 718 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 2.39 GPa for FDM Polycarbonate, so the same part in Nickel Inconel 718 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, FDM Polycarbonate or Nickel Inconel 718?
For the same stiffness or strength: FDM Polycarbonate is lighter for a stiff panel or plate, strong panel or plate; Nickel Inconel 718 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), stiff beam (bending), strong rod or tie, strong beam.
| Part that must be | FDM Polycarbonate | Nickel Inconel 718 |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | 12.1x heavier | lighter |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 32% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | lighter | 1.58x heavier |
| Strong rod or tie | 3.28x heavier | lighter |
| Strong beam | 16% heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | lighter | 45% heavier |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, FDM Polycarbonate or Nickel Inconel 718?
Nickel Inconel 718 conducts heat better: 11.4 W/m·K against 0.2 W/m·K for FDM Polycarbonate.
Which expands less with temperature?
Nickel Inconel 718 expands less: 13.2 µm/m·K against 65 µm/m·K for FDM Polycarbonate.
Among 59 materials
Related comparisons
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Nylon
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic Polycarbonate
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. Plastic ABS (bulk/injection)
- FDM Polycarbonate vs. SLA Resin Standard
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Stainless Steel 17-4PH
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel AISI 4340
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel AISI 1045