Materials / Compare
Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Plastic PPS GF40
Compare Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Plastic PPS GF40 strength, stiffness, weight and thermal properties.
| Try it on a partA bracket to run stress or thermal on, free in your browser | Open in LessCAD | Open in LessCAD |
|---|---|---|
| Mechanical | ||
| Yield strength | 1,207MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. hot-rolled bar, 0.2% offset | not given (tensile used) |
| Ultimate tensile strength | 1,389MPasourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar | 195MPasourcetensile strength, 5 mm/min |
| Flexural strength | not sourced | 285MPasourceflexural strength at break |
| Elongation at break | 20%sourcetypical, 1.0 in. bar | 1.9%sourcestrain at break, 5 mm/min |
| Young's modulus (stiffness) | 200GPasourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged | 14.7GPasourcetypical, 1 mm/min |
| Density | 8,221kg/m³sourcenominal, annealed and aged | 1,650kg/m³sourcetypical |
| Strength to weight | 147kN·m/kg24% higher | 118kN·m/kg |
| Stiffness to weight | 24.3MN·m/kg2.73x higher | 8.91MN·m/kg |
| Poisson's ratio | 0.294sourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged | 0.35sourceglass-reinforced Fortron PPS (class value, not grade-specific) |
| Shear modulus | 77.3GPa14.2x stiffer in shear | 5.44GPa |
| Bulk modulus | 162GPa | 16.3GPa |
| Speed of sound | 4,932m/s | 2,985m/s |
| Thermal | ||
| Thermal conductivity | 11.4W/m·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C, annealed + aged (calculated from resistivity per footnote a) | 0.2W/m·Ksource40% glass-reinforced Fortron, 25 °C (not grade-specific) |
| Thermal expansion | 13.2µm/m·Ksourcetypical, mean 21-93 °C, annealed + aged | 12µm/m·Ksourceparallel (flow), mean -50 to 90 °C |
| 100 mm part over a 50 °C swing | 66µm growth | 60µm growth10% less |
| Specific heat | 435J/kg·Ksourcetypical, 21 °C | not sourced |
| Heats up and cools (diffusivity) | 3.19mm²/s | not sourced |
| Thermal shock resistance | 3,680W/m25.6x more resistant | 144W/m |
| Melting point | 1,260–1,336°Csourcemelting range | 280°CsourceDSC, 10 °C/min |
| Glass transition | not sourced | 90°CsourceDSC, 10 °C/min |
| Max service temperature | 704°Csourceupper use temperature stated by producer | 270°CsourceHDT 1.8 MPa |
| Values for | INCONEL alloy 718, standard grade, 1750 °F/1 hr anneal + 1325 °F/8 hr F.C. to 1150 °F aged; Special Metals bulletin SMC-045 typical values | Celanese Fortron 1140L4 (PPS, 40% glass fibre), injection moulding; FORTRON PPS Short-Term Properties Guide (PPS-012, 2016); thermal conductivity and Poisson for 40% glass-reinforced Fortron from the Fortron PPS Design Manual (PPS-050, 2013). |
Every value links to the document that states it. "Not sourced" means no citable source states it (or only a specification minimum); figures computed from it are left out too.
Questions
Is Nickel Inconel 718 stronger than Plastic PPS GF40?
Nickel Inconel 718 is stronger: its yield strength is 1,207 MPa against tensile strength 195 MPa for Plastic PPS GF40 (6.19x).
Which is lighter, Nickel Inconel 718 or Plastic PPS GF40?
Plastic PPS GF40 is lighter: 1,650 kg/m³ against 8,221 kg/m³ for Nickel Inconel 718.
Which is stiffer, Nickel Inconel 718 or Plastic PPS GF40?
Nickel Inconel 718 is stiffer: Young's modulus 200 GPa against 14.7 GPa for Plastic PPS GF40, so the same part in Nickel Inconel 718 deflects less under the same load.
Which is lighter for the same job, Nickel Inconel 718 or Plastic PPS GF40?
For the same stiffness or strength: Nickel Inconel 718 is lighter for a stiff rod or tie (tension), strong rod or tie; Plastic PPS GF40 is lighter for a stiff beam (bending), stiff panel or plate, strong beam, strong panel or plate.
| Part that must be | Nickel Inconel 718 | Plastic PPS GF40 |
|---|---|---|
| Stiff rod or tie (tension) | lighter | 2.73x heavier |
| Stiff beam (bending) | 35% heavier | lighter |
| Stiff panel or plate | 2.09x heavier | lighter |
| Strong rod or tie | lighter | 24% heavier |
| Strong beam | 48% heavier | lighter |
| Strong panel or plate | 2x heavier | lighter |
For the same stiffness or strength, mass scales with density over stiffness (or strength) raised to a power set by how the part is loaded: 1 for a rod in tension, 1/2 for a beam in bending, 1/3 for a panel (the standard material-selection indices).
Which conducts heat better, Nickel Inconel 718 or Plastic PPS GF40?
Nickel Inconel 718 conducts heat better: 11.4 W/m·K against 0.2 W/m·K for Plastic PPS GF40.
Which expands less with temperature?
Plastic PPS GF40 expands less: 12 µm/m·K against 13.2 µm/m·K for Nickel Inconel 718.
Among 72 materials
Related comparisons
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Stainless Steel 17-4PH
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel AISI 4340
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. DMLS 17-4PH Stainless Steel
- Nickel Inconel 718 vs. Steel AISI 1045
- Plastic PPS GF40 vs. Plastic PBT GF30
- Plastic PPS GF40 vs. Plastic LCP GF30
- Plastic PPS GF40 vs. Concrete
- Plastic PPS GF40 vs. PCB Laminate FR-4